Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Expression of Cementitious Pore Solution and the Analysis of Its Chemical Composition and Resistivity Using X-ray Fluorescence
Published on: September 23, 2018
Evolution of a Filling Paste Cementitious System and Impact Patterns of Sulfate Mine Water Erosion on Filling Paste
Yao Lu1,2, Changxiang Wang1, Yongqiang Zhou1
1College of Safety Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232000, China.
Abstract:
To assess the impact of sulfate mine water on filling material performance, an accelerated sulfate erosion process was used to analyze the effects of various erosion concentrations, aging periods, and cation types on the macroscopic properties of the filling paste. These properties encompassed apparent phenomena, mass changes, and alterations in the uniaxial compressive strength. Observations revealed sulfate erosion, causing the formation of white substances and salt crystals on specimen surfaces. Initially, all solution-eroded specimens exhibited increased mass and strength. Over time, specimens in 5 and 10% MgSO4 solutions displayed the first signs of decline, while variations in other solutions were relatively small. Increasing the erosion concentration led to greater variations in mass and strength during the initial erosion phase. Specimens in 5 and 10% MgSO4 solutions initially peaked in mass and compressive strength, followed by a decline, while other filling paste specimens continued slow increases. Under equivalent conditions, the MgSO4 solution exhibited stronger erosion than the Na2SO4 solution. Composite erosion by Na2SO4 and MgSO4 involved initial strengthening and gel pore filling, intermediate expansion and crystallization, and late-stage substantial degradation, with MgSO4 exhibiting a more pronounced and complex impact. Gray relational analysis ranked factors affecting mass and uniaxial compressive strength variations as erosion concentration > erosion ion type > erosion aging period. Correlation degrees for factors influencing mass variations were 0.8822, 0.8714, and 0.4754, while for factors influencing uniaxial compressive strength variations, the correlation degrees were 0.8336, 0.7943, and 0.6125, respectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Sulfate Attack on Concrete
Sulfates from sources like soil, groundwater, or industrial effluents...
Soundness of Cement
Types of Cement II
Effect of Sea Water on Concrete
Concrete in areas between tide marks,...
Pore Size Distribution
Adequate...

