Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

89
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
89
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

4.1K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.1K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

39
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
39
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.3K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.3K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.2K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

4.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of potent BChE/Nrf2 modulators for Alzheimer's disease treatment via dual suppression of ferroptosis.

European journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

High-level biosynthesis of gastrodin in engineered Escherichia coli.

Journal of biotechnology·2026
Same author

Source apportionment of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) personal exposures: findings from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) study in rural Guatemala.

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2026
Same author

Neighborhood factors and the geography of type 2 diabetes in Malaysia: an ecological based geospatial modelling study.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Impact of Post-exposure Prophylaxis on Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Initiation Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Nested Case-control Study.

AIDS and behavior·2026
Same author

Disturbance Observer-Based Model Predictive Control for Multi-Frequency Interference Suppression in Space Laser Communication Systems.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K

Enhanced Inference for Finite Population Sampling-Based Prevalence Estimation with Misclassification Errors.

Lin Ge1, Yuzi Zhang1, Lance A Waller1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.

The American Statistician
|April 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate disease prevalence estimation requires accounting for imperfect diagnostic tests in finite populations. This study introduces a novel statistical method to correct for misdiagnosis and finite population effects, improving variance estimation and interval accuracy.

Keywords:
bias correctioncredible intervalfinite population correctionrandom samplingsensitivityspecificity

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Epidemiologic screening programs utilize diagnostic tests with inherent probabilities of misdiagnosis.
  • Accurate estimation of disease prevalence is crucial for public health interventions.
  • Standard statistical methods may not adequately address misclassification errors and finite population effects simultaneously.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an enhanced inferential approach for prevalence estimation in finite populations with imperfect diagnostic tests.
  • To develop a method that correctly estimates variance, accounting for both sampling and misclassification.
  • To create a Bayesian credible interval with improved frequentist properties for disease prevalence.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator for disease prevalence.
  • Derived an additional variance component attributable to misclassification in finite populations.
  • Adapted a Bayesian credible interval and compared its frequentist performance to a Wald-type interval.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method provides a standard error estimate that accurately reflects sampling variability and misclassification.
  • The novel approach effectively leverages the finite population correction (FPC) indirectly for valid inference.
  • Simulation results demonstrate superior coverage and width for the adapted Bayesian credible interval compared to Wald intervals.

Conclusions:

  • The enhanced inferential approach offers a more accurate estimation of disease prevalence in finite populations with imperfect tests.
  • The method addresses limitations of ignoring finite population effects or direct FPC application.
  • The adapted Bayesian credible interval provides a statistically robust tool for prevalence estimation in epidemiologic studies.