Evaluating Catheter Ablation Versus Conventional Management for Ventricular Arrhythmias in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Background Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a challenging genetic disorder marked by ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, particularly in athletes and young adults. Despite its clinical significance, the relative effectiveness and safety of catheter ablation versus conventional management in ARVC are not fully delineated. Objective This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation compared to conventional management in reducing ventricular arrhythmias and improving patient outcomes over five years in ARVC patients. Methods In a retrospective cohort design at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, we analyzed 120 ARVC patients from January 2018 to December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those undergoing catheter ablation and those receiving conventional management. Primary outcomes assessed were recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, procedural complications, hospitalization duration, and mortality rates. Logistic regression was adjusted for demographics and clinical variables. Results Catheter ablation significantly lowered the recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (20% vs. 55%, p<0.01) and reduced hospital stay duration (4 ± 2 days vs. 7 ± 3 days, p<0.05). A trend toward reduced five-year mortality was observed in the catheter ablation group (5% vs. 15%, p=0.07). Age, New York Heart Association class, and exercise capacity emerged as significant predictors of outcomes. Conclusions Catheter ablation outperforms conventional management in reducing the recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and hospitalization in ARVC patients, with a promising trend toward enhanced survival. These findings advocate for personalized management strategies in ARVC, highlighting the necessity for further research to establish the long-term benefits of catheter ablation.