Live-cell imaging reveals the trade-off between target search flexibility and efficiency for Cas9 and Cas12a

Lorenzo Olivi1, Cleo Bagchus1,2, Victor Pool1,2

  • 1Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Nucleic Acids Research
|April 22, 2024
PubMed

Insights

CRISPR-Cas genome editing nucleases, SpyCas9 and LbCas12a, were studied for their DNA target search efficiency. LbCas12a variants demonstrate faster and more efficient DNA targeting compared to SpyCas9 variants, especially when PAM requirements are relaxed.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • CRISPR-Cas systems are essential genome editing tools utilizing Cas nucleases like SpyCas9 and LbCas12a.
  • These nucleases differ in PAM recognition, guide structure, and DNA cleavage mechanisms.
  • Engineered variants, SpRYCas9 and impLbCas12a, expand the DNA targeting range by relaxing PAM constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of protein-specific characteristics on DNA target search kinetics for CRISPR-Cas nucleases.
  • To compare the DNA search efficiency between wild-type and engineered SpyCas9 and LbCas12a variants.
  • To establish a framework for analyzing DNA target search dynamics in other nucleases.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized catalytically inactive dCas9 and dCas12a variants fused to PAmCherry2.1 for single-particle tracking in Escherichia coli.
  • Performed single-particle tracking experiments to derive kinetic parameters for DNA target interrogation.
  • Employed simulations and live-cell imaging to validate findings on target search efficiency.

Main Results:

  • Kinetic analysis revealed that LbCas12a variants interrogate DNA faster than SpyCas9 variants when using non-targeting RNA guides.
  • In the presence of a specific target DNA site, LbCas12a variants exhibited superior speed and efficiency in target acquisition compared to SpyCas9 variants.
  • The study quantified the trade-offs associated with relaxing PAM requirements in both SpyCas9 and LbCas12a systems.

Conclusions:

  • LbCas12a nucleases demonstrate inherent advantages in DNA target search speed and efficiency over SpyCas9.
  • Relaxing PAM specificity in engineered variants impacts DNA search dynamics, presenting a trade-off between target accessibility and search kinetics.
  • The developed single-particle tracking framework provides a versatile method for quantifying DNA search processes in various nucleases.