Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025
X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Task-based automatic keV selection: leveraging routine virtual monoenergetic imaging for dose reduction on clinical
Kishore Rajendran1, Michael Bruesewitz1, Joseph Swicklik1
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Abstract:
Objective. Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT enables routine virtual-monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstruction. We evaluated the performance of an automatic VMI energy level (keV) selection tool on a clinical PCD-CT system in comparison to an automatic tube potential (kV) selection tool from an energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT system from the same manufacturer.Approach.Four torso-shaped phantoms (20-50 cm width) containing iodine (2, 5, and 10 mg cc-1) and calcium (100 mg cc-1) were scanned on PCD-CT and EID-CT. Dose optimization techniques, task-based VMI energy level and tube-potential selection on PCD-CT (CARE keV) and task-based tube potential selection on EID-CT (CARE kV), were enabled. CT numbers, image noise, and dose-normalized contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRd) were compared.Main results. PCD-CT produced task-specific VMIs at 70, 65, 60, and 55 keV for non-contrast, bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular settings, respectively. A 120 kV tube potential was automatically selected on PCD-CT for all scans. In comparison, EID-CT used x-ray tube potentials from 80 to 150 kV based on imaging task and phantom size. PCD-CT achieved consistent dose reduction at 9%, 21% and 39% for bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular tasks relative to the non-contrast task, independent of phantom size. On EID-CT, dose reduction factor for contrast tasks relative to the non-contrast task ranged from a 65% decrease (vascular task, 70 kV, 20 cm phantom) to a 21% increase (soft tissue with contrast task, 150 kV, 50 cm phantom) due to size-specific tube potential adaptation. PCD-CT CNRdwas equivalent to or higher than those of EID-CT for all tasks and phantom sizes, except for the vascular task with 20 cm phantom, where 70 kV EID-CT CNRdoutperformed 55 keV PCD-CT images.Significance. PCD-CT produced more consistent CT numbers compared to EID-CT due to standardized VMI output, which greatly benefits standardization efforts and facilitates radiation dose reduction.
