Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

03:25
Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
909
Manual Dexterity Predictors of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Success
Kendrick Campbell1, Joel Vetter1, Fernandino L Vilson1
1Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Urology
|April 22, 2024
Summary
Preoperative pinch and peg tests can predict patient satisfaction and confidence after artificial urinary sphincter surgery for incontinence. These simple tests offer valuable insights for surgical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Reconstructive Surgery
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement is a treatment for stress urinary incontinence.
- Predicting patient satisfaction and functional outcomes after AUS is crucial for surgical success.
- Standardized in-office measures are needed to assess pre-operative functional status relevant to AUS use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate preoperative manual function tests for predicting postoperative outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement.
- To identify simple, in-office assessments that correlate with patient satisfaction, confidence, and ease of use after AUS surgery.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 39 patients undergoing AUS for stress urinary incontinence.
- Preoperative assessments included timed 9-hole peg test, pinch strength, grip strength, and upper extremity questionnaire.
- Postoperative outcomes assessed at 3 months included satisfaction, confidence, and ease of use via surveys.
Main Results:
- 59% of patients reported high satisfaction, 64% experienced no difficulty, and 54% felt confident within 1 day post-surgery.
- The preoperative pinch test was significantly associated with postoperative satisfaction (P=.011).
- The preoperative 9-hole peg test was significantly associated with postoperative confidence (P=.049).
Conclusions:
- The pinch and 9-hole peg transfer tests are cost-effective and easily performed.
- These tests can aid in evaluating patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter placement, particularly those with unclear manual functional status.
- Incorporating these simple tests may improve the prediction of patient-reported outcomes after AUS surgery.

