Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

09:54
A Recovery Cardiopulmonary Bypass Model Without Transfusion or Inotropic Agents in Rats
Published on: March 23, 2018
7.9K
A systematic review of cardiac surgery clinical prediction models that include intra-operative variables
Ceri Jones1,2, Marcus Taylor3, Matthew Sperrin1
1Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Perfusion
|April 22, 2024
Summary
This systematic review found that clinical prediction models (CPMs) using intra-operative variables in cardiac surgery show potential for improved accuracy. However, reporting and methodological weaknesses limit their current use.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Clinical prediction models (CPMs) for cardiac surgery typically rely on pre-operative data.
- Intra-operative variables are less commonly incorporated into CPMs, limiting their widespread adoption.
- This review systematically identifies CPMs using intra-operative variables for short-term outcomes in adult cardiac surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and evaluate clinical prediction models (CPMs) that incorporate intra-operative variables.
- To assess the performance and limitations of existing CPMs for predicting short-term outcomes in adult cardiac surgery.
- To understand the potential added value of intra-operative data in cardiac surgery CPMs.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (inception to December 2022).
- Inclusion of studies developing CPMs with at least one intra-operative variable.
- Data extraction using a critical appraisal framework and bias assessment tool, with analysis of model performance (discrimination and calibration).
Main Results:
- Twenty-four models were identified, frequently predicting acute kidney injury and peri-operative mortality.
- Common intra-operative variables included cardiopulmonary bypass time and transfusion.
- While model discrimination was acceptable, calibration was often poor or unreported, and most models had high risk of bias.
Conclusions:
- Weak reporting and methodological limitations hinder the adoption of intra-operative CPMs.
- Evidence suggests intra-operative variables can improve CPM discrimination.
- Further research is needed to establish the role of intra-operative CPMs in managing cardiac surgery patients.

