Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

P50 Sensory Gating in Infants
Published on: December 26, 2013
Neurological aspects of infant hearing assessment
Insights
Infant hearing screening reveals a higher incidence of sensorineural hearing loss in infants with a positive neurological history. Auditory evoked responses offer valuable insights into neurological status and associated conditions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Neurology
- Audiology
Background:
- Infant hearing screening is crucial for early detection of hearing loss.
- Neurological impairment can impact auditory development and function.
- Understanding the interplay between neurological status and hearing is vital for comprehensive infant care.
Observation:
- A higher incidence of sensorineural hearing impairment (3.13%) was observed in infants with a positive neurological history compared to those with a negative history (1.3%).
- Auditory evoked responses (AERs) provided additional information regarding the neurological status of infants.
- Specific neurological conditions were often associated with characteristic AER configurations.
Findings:
- Infants with a history of neurological dysfunction exhibit a significantly higher risk of sensorineural hearing impairment.
- Auditory evoked potentials, including brainstem and later components, are valuable tools for assessing neurological status in infants.
- Distinct patterns in auditory evoked responses correlate with specific neurological problems, aiding in diagnosis.
Implications:
- Early identification of hearing loss in neurologically at-risk infants can lead to timely intervention.
- Integrating auditory evoked potential assessments into neurological evaluations can enhance diagnostic accuracy.
- This research underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to infant neurodevelopmental assessment, combining audiological and neurological perspectives.
Abstract:
The relationship between the results of an infant hearing screening program and neurological impairment may be considered in two ways: 1) Is there a correlation between incidence of neurological dysfunction and the incidence of sensorineural hearing loss in the target population? In our target population, the incidence of sensorineural hearing impairment was 3.13% for the group with a positive neurological history vs. 1.3% in those with a negative neurological history. 2) Do auditory evoked potentials used for hearing screening and follow-up provide any additional information on the neurological status of the target population, or, are certain neurological conditions associated with certain typical auditory evoked potential configurations? In our experience auditory evoked responses do provide additional information especially if for diagnostic purposes both the brainstem and the later components are considered. Often, specific neurological problems may be associated with typical auditory evoked response configurations.

