Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Using Epistemic Injustice to Examine Scholarship About Sexual Violence Among Students With Minoritized Identities
Chris Linder1, Cydney Y Caradonna1, Quentin Hodges1
1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Scholarship on sexual violence (SV) often overlooks minoritized students, focusing on prevalence and risk factors without relevant theories. This exclusion leads to ineffective research and practice, perpetuating high SV rates for all students.
Area of Science:
- Higher Education Studies
- Sociology of Education
- Public Health
Background:
- Sexual violence (SV) remains a significant issue on college campuses.
- Existing scholarship on SV has historically centered on dominant student populations.
- Minoritized students, including students of color, students with disabilities, and queer and/or trans students, face unique challenges and experiences with SV.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in scholarship concerning sexual violence (SV) and minoritized student populations over a 10-year period.
- To identify gaps in theoretical frameworks and research approaches within SV scholarship pertaining to diverse student identities.
- To examine the implications of current scholarship practices on the effectiveness of SV prevention and intervention efforts.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive content analysis was conducted on academic literature published over the last decade.
- The analysis focused on scholarship addressing sexual violence in relation to students of color, students with disabilities, and queer and/or trans students.
- Epistemic injustice was utilized as a theoretical lens to interpret the findings.
Main Results:
- The majority of SV scholarship involving minoritized students concentrates on prevalence rates and risk factors.
- A significant lack of theoretical frameworks tailored to the specific experiences of these student populations was identified.
- Research and practice often fail to adequately address the unique contexts and needs of minoritized students affected by SV.
Conclusions:
- The exclusion of minoritized students' perspectives and experiences in SV scholarship results in ineffective interventions.
- Applying an epistemic injustice framework highlights how silencing or marginalizing these students' knowledge perpetuates harm.
- Addressing these gaps is crucial for developing more equitable and effective strategies to combat sexual violence in higher education for all students.
Related Concept Videos
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Fundamental Attribution Error
Bullying
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Ethics in Research

