Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

10:44
Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
Published on: July 1, 2016
11.4K
Resolving Uncertainties in the Quantification of Trace Elements within Organic-Rich Boreal Rivers for AF4-UV-ICP-MS
Yu Wang1, Chad W Cuss1,2, Lei Pei1
1Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2H1, Canada.
Analytical Chemistry
|April 23, 2024
Summary
Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) can lead to trace element loss and contamination. Preconditioning the AF4 system with Suwannee River Natural Organic Matter mitigates these artifacts in complex water samples.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Separation Science
Background:
- Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) is a key technique for separating trace elements (TEs) associated with colloids in water.
- Understanding and controlling artifacts is crucial for accurate TE measurements at low concentrations using AF4-UV-ICP-MS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential artifacts in AF4-UV-ICP-MS analysis of colloid-associated TEs in boreal river water.
- To identify sources of TE loss and contamination, and to develop strategies for artifact mitigation.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of boreal river water using AF4-UV-ICP-MS.
- Evaluation of TE adsorption onto non-channel surfaces and membrane contamination.
- Assessment of colloid-driven carryover and contaminant removal.
- Testing preconditioning strategies with Suwannee River Natural Organic Matter (SRNOM).
Main Results:
- Adsorption of Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Pb onto non-channel surfaces caused up to 48% TE loss.
- Cross-contamination of Co, Ni, Cu, and Pb was observed from non-channel surfaces.
- Uncleaned membranes introduced Ni and Cu contamination.
- Colloids can cause analytical bias through carryover but also remove contaminants.
Conclusions:
- Instrumental artifacts, including TE loss and contamination, are significant in AF4-UV-ICP-MS analysis of complex waters.
- Preconditioning the AF4 system with SRNOM is recommended to reduce membrane fouling and carryover.
- A comprehensive strategy is presented to minimize instrumental artifacts for accurate TE measurements.
Related Concept Videos
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
451
Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) is a highly selective and sensitive technique for accurate elemental analysis. Though the analysis of ICP–MS mass spectra is comparatively straightforward, it is affected by spectroscopic and non-spectroscopic interferences. Spectroscopic interferences arise when the plasma contains ionic species with an m/z value the same as the analyte ion. Spectroscopic interference can be categorized as isobaric, polyatomic ions, and...
451
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
1.8K
Precipitation and coprecipitation methods can be used to separate a mixture of ions in a solution. In qualitative inorganic analysis, ions that form sparingly soluble precipitates with the same reagent are separated based on the differences in solubility products. For example, consider the separation of Cu(II) and Fe(II) ions by precipitation as insoluble sulfides. First, copper(II) sulfide is precipitated by the addition of acidic H2S, where the dissociation of H2S is suppressed. Adding H2S...
1.8K
Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS): Overview
725
In inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS), an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) torch is used as an atomizer and ionizer. Solid samples are dissolved and volatilized before being introduced into the high-temperature argon plasma, while solution samples are nebulized and passed through the high-temperature argon plasma. Plasma dissociates the analytes and ionizes their component atoms to form a mixture of positive ions and molecular species. The positive ions are then...
725

