Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026
Using a Knee Arthrometer to Evaluate Tissue-specific Contributions to Knee Flexion Contracture in the Rat
Published on: November 9, 2018
The effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on range of motion: a meta-analysis
Sien Tang1, Li Sheng2, Jinming Xia2
1The Fourth Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, No. 995 Kangding Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200000, China. tangsien0105@163.com.
Background:
To evaluate the effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on range of motion (ROM).
Methods:
We performed a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 23, 2023. Randomized controlled trials that compared treatment groups receiving IASTM to controls or IASTM plus another treatment(s) to other treatment(s) among healthy individuals with or without ROM deficits, or patients with musculoskeletal disorders were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias.
Results:
Nine trials including 450 participants were included in the quantitative analysis. The IASTM was effective in improving ROM in degree in healthy individuals with ROM deficits and patients with musculoskeletal disorders (n=4) (MD = 4.94, 95% CI: 3.29 to 6.60), and in healthy individuals without ROM deficits (n=4) (MD = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.30 to 3.34), but failed to improve ROM in centimeter in healthy individuals with ROM deficits (n=1) (MD = 0.39, 95% CI: -1.34 to 2.11, p=0.66, I2 = 88%).
Conclusions:
IASTM can improve ROM in degree in healthy individuals with or without ROM deficits, or in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (with very low to low certainty).
Trial Registration:
The PROSPERO registration ID is CRD42023425200.
