Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2025

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Comprehensive in silico analysis of prolactin receptor (PRLR) gene nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms
Anila Hoda1, Bajram Berisha2, Xhiliola Bixheku3
1Department Animal Sciences, Agricultural University of Tirana, Albania.
Abstract:
This study delves into the functional and structural implications of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) within the Prolactin Receptor (PRLR) gene. Thirteen deleterious nsSNPs were identified through bioinformatics tools, with SIFT predicting 168 out of 395 nsSNPs as detrimental, exhibiting tolerance index (TI) scores ranging from 0 to 0.05. Polyphen2 assigned likelihood scores >0.99 to all 13 nsSNPs, indicating high probability of harm, while Panther scores classified most nsSNPs as 'probably damaging', with specific mutations like W218R scoring 0.74, suggesting a higher impact. Stability analysis using DDG I-Mutant and DDG Mupro consistently predicted decreased stability for all mutations, with CUPSAT indicating mutations like V125G and W218R significantly decreasing stability. Structural analysis through DynaMut predicted destabilization for all mutations except L196I and L292H. MutPred2 highlighted structural alterations for all nsSNPs except L196I, L293V, R315W, and S353N. Domain analysis revealed key mutations within essential functional domains, with five nsSNPs located within Fibronectin type-III domains. Bayesian analysis through ConSurf identified 9 critical residues, with 11 nsSNPs exhibiting notably high conservation. STRING analysis unveiled a complex interaction network, indicating involvement in vital biological processes like lactation. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, spanning 100 nanoseconds, elucidated structural dynamics induced by detrimental missense SNPs. Post-translational modification (PTM) analysis identified specific mutations, such as R351, involved in methylation, while S353 was implicated in phosphorylation and glycosylation. These findings offer comprehensive insights into the molecular and phenotypic effects of deleterious nsSNPs in the PRLR gene, crucial for selective breeding.
More Related Videos
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
06:50Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-protein Interfaces
Signal Sequences and Sorting Receptors
Ligand Binding and Linkage