Determining minimal clinically important differences in the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded for untreated

Giorgia Coratti1,2, Francesca Bovis3, Maria Carmela Pera1,2

  • 1Pediatric Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC) values for the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) vary significantly between Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) types II and III. Caution is advised when interpreting these values for assessing treatment response in diverse SMA populations.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, progressive neuromuscular disease with diverse clinical presentations.
  • The Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) is a key outcome measure for SMA.
  • Establishing reliable MCID and MDC values is crucial for interpreting HFMSE changes in clinical trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC) for the HFMSE in an untreated, international cohort of SMA patients.
  • To determine if MCID and MDC values differ based on SMA type (II and III), age, and functional status.

Main Methods:

  • Minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated using distribution-based methods (standard error of measurement, effect size) in 321 SMA patients.
  • Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed using anchor-based methods (ROC analysis, standard error) in 76 SMA patients, anchored to caregiver perception.
  • Patients were stratified by SMA type (II and III), age, and functional status.

Main Results:

  • MCID values differed between SMA type II (-2 via ROC) and type III (-4 via ROC).
  • MCID values for improvement (1.5) and deterioration (-3.2) also varied when using standard error.
  • Distribution-based MDC values showed variability across different age and functional subgroups within each SMA type.

Conclusions:

  • A single MCID or MDC value for the HFMSE is insufficient for interpreting treatment effects in heterogeneous SMA cohorts.
  • Interpretation of HFMSE changes requires consideration of individual patient characteristics, including SMA type, age, and functional status.
  • These findings are critical for the accurate assessment of therapeutic responses in ongoing and future SMA clinical trials.

Related Concept Videos