Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

05:58
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
4.0K
CoaguChek and Coag-Sense PT2 Meter Point of Care INR Device Validation
Robert D McBane1, Carlee O'Connor2, Jennifer Lutz3
1Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Cardiovascular Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
|April 25, 2024
Summary
The CoaguChek point-of-care device demonstrated superior accuracy for international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring in warfarin patients compared to the Coag-Sense device. This leads to more reliable dosing decisions and improved patient management.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Medical Devices
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Warfarin therapy requires regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) to ensure efficacy and safety.
- Accurate INR measurements are crucial for preventing thromboembolic events and bleeding complications.
- Standardizing point-of-care (POC) INR testing can improve data integrity and facilitate electronic result transmission.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of two commercially available POC INR devices against a plasma INR reference method.
- To assess the concordance, bias, and dosing decision accuracy of POC INR devices for warfarin monitoring.
- To determine the suitability of POC devices for electronic result transmission and standardized INR measurements.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter study compared the Coag-Sense PT2 Meter and CoaguChek XS Pro/Plus devices against an internal plasma INR reference method.
- Two hundred ninety-nine warfarin-treated patients were enrolled across three Mayo Clinic sites.
- Bias, linear regression analysis, and dosing decision accuracy were assessed for each POC device.
Main Results:
- The CoaguChek devices showed higher concordance with plasma INR, with 95.3% of values within 0.4 INR units (R²=0.93).
- The Coag-Sense device had lower concordance, with 60.2% of values within 0.4 INR units (R²=0.83).
- Appropriate dosing recommendations based on plasma INR were achieved for 97.7% of CoaguChek results versus 81.6% for Coag-Sense.
Conclusions:
- The CoaguChek devices demonstrated less systematic bias and greater concordance with plasma INR compared to the Coag-Sense device.
- POC INR devices, particularly CoaguChek, offer a reliable alternative for warfarin monitoring, enabling accurate dosing decisions.
- These findings support the use of CoaguChek devices for standardized INR measurements and electronic result transmission in clinical practice.

