Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

02:28
Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
378
Agreement Between Physician Evaluation and the Composite Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis
Boyang Zheng1, Mianbo Wang2, Kerry McKenna2
1McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Arthritis Care & Research
|April 25, 2024
Summary
The Composite Response Index in diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) shows substantial agreement with physician assessments for clinical trials. This validates the CRISS as a reliable outcome measure for diffuse cutaneous SSc patient improvement.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Trials
- Systemic Sclerosis Research
Background:
- Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex and highly variable autoimmune disease.
- The Composite Response Index in diffuse cutaneous SSc (CRISS) is a provisional 1-year outcome measure for clinical trials.
- Further validation of the CRISS is necessary to confirm its reliability in assessing treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the Composite Response Index in diffuse cutaneous SSc (CRISS) by comparing its improvement criteria with expert physician evaluations.
- To assess the agreement between the CRISS cutoff score and physician-determined outcomes in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc.
Main Methods:
- Patient profiles of 100 diffuse cutaneous SSc patients (50 improved, 50 non-improved by CRISS) with <5 years disease duration were analyzed.
- Three expert physicians independently evaluated each patient's disease status at baseline and 1 year.
- Kappa statistics were used to calculate agreement between physician majority opinion and the CRISS cutoff of 0.6.
Main Results:
- Substantial agreement was found between the CRISS and physician majority opinion (κ = 0.76).
- Individual physician agreement with the CRISS was also substantial (κ = 0.70).
- While all CRISS non-improvers were deemed non-improved by physicians, 12 CRISS improvers were classified as non-improved by physicians.
Conclusions:
- The CRISS cutoff of 0.6 demonstrates substantial agreement with physician assessments for evaluating improvement in diffuse cutaneous SSc.
- The CRISS is a validated outcome measure for clinical trials in diffuse cutaneous SSc.
- Physician assessments identified fewer improved patients compared to the CRISS, suggesting a potential difference in sensitivity.

