Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Investigating Aortic Valve Calcification via Isolation and Culture of T Lymphocytes using Feeder Cells from Irradiated Buffy Coat
Published on: February 4, 2021
Disproportionately high aortic valve calcium scores in atrial fibrillation: implications for transcatheter aortic
Rajeev Masson1, Vuyisile T Nkomo2, David R Holmes2
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Insights
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) had more severe aortic stenosis (AS) and worse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared to those in sinus rhythm (SR). This suggests AS severity is underestimated in AF patients, potentially delaying TAVR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Doppler mean gradient (MG) may underestimate aortic stenosis (AS) severity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) versus sinus rhythm (SR).
- This underestimation can potentially delay timely intervention in AF patients.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a key treatment for severe AS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes in patients with AF and SR following TAVR.
- To investigate potential delays in TAVR referral for AF patients using computed tomography aortic valve calcium score (AVCS).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 820 patients undergoing TAVR for severe AS (2013-2017).
- Comparison of baseline characteristics, AVCS, and overall survival between AF and SR groups.
- Statistical analysis to identify factors associated with mortality post-TAVR.
Main Results:
- Patients with AF (n=356) were older and had lower MG but similar indexed aortic valve area compared to SR patients.
- Median AVCS was significantly higher in AF patients (males P=0.044, females P=0.025).
- Median survival post-TAVR was worse in AF patients (3.2 years) compared to SR patients (5.4 years), with AF being a significant predictor of mortality.
Conclusions:
- Older age and higher AVCS in AF patients suggest AS was underestimated and more advanced at TAVR referral.
- Atrial fibrillation is associated with worse outcomes after TAVR.
- Current AS severity assessment may need adjustment for patients with AF.
Aims:
Doppler mean gradient (MG) can underestimate aortic stenosis (AS) severity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with patients with sinus rhythm (SR), potentially delaying intervention in AF. This study compared outcomes in patients with AF and SR following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and investigated delay in TAVR based on computed tomography aortic valve calcium score (AVCS).
Methods And Results:
Patients who underwent TAVR from 2013 to 2017 for native valve severe AS were identified from an institutional database. Baseline characteristics and overall survival were compared between those with SR and AF. There were 820 patients (mean age 81 years; 41.6% females) included in this study. AF was present in 356 patients. Patients with AF were older (82.2 vs. 80.5, P = 0.003) and had a lower MG compared with patients with SR (42.0 vs. 44.9, P = 0.002) with similar indexed aortic valve area (0.4 vs. 0.4, P = 0.17). Median AVCS was higher in AF (males: AF 2850.0 vs. SR 2561.0, P = 0.044; females: AF 1942.0 vs. SR 1610.5, P = 0.025). Projected AVCS, assuming the same age of diagnosis, was similar between AF and SR. Median survival post-TAVR was worse in AF compared with SR (3.2 vs. 5.4 years, log rank P < 0.001). AF, lower MG, higher right ventricular systolic pressure, dialysis, diabetes, and significant tricuspid regurgitation were associated with higher mortality (P < 0.05 for all).
Conclusion:
Older age and higher AVCS in patients with AF compared with those with SR suggest that AS was both underestimated and more advanced at TAVR referral.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

