Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessing Body Temperature - Oral01:14

Assessing Body Temperature - Oral

743
Here are the steps to accurately measure oral temperature using an electronic thermometer:
Step 1:
Start by practicing proper hand hygiene to prevent the spread of microorganisms.
Step 2:
Take the thermometer out of the charging unit, switch it on, and wait for the ready sign.
Step 3:
Gently slide the probe cover until a click is heard. This simple action prevents cross-contamination and ensures the correct placement of the probe cover.
Step 4:
Instruct the patient to open their mouth and place...
743
Temperature Measurement Sites01:14

Temperature Measurement Sites

1.7K
A thermometer measures body temperature. The common sites for measuring body temperature are the oral cavity, axillary region, temporal artery, and skin surface, such as the forehead, abdomen, and axilla. True core body temperature is assessed in the rectum, tympanic membrane, pulmonary artery, esophagus, and urinary bladder.
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
1.7K
Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery01:19

Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery

544
Here is a stepwise guide to assessing the body temperature at the temporal artery using a temporal artery thermometer
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.  
Step 3: Assess the patient's...
544
Assessing Body Temperature - Tympanic membrane01:14

Assessing Body Temperature - Tympanic membrane

580
Assessing tympanic membrane temperature involves using a tympanic membrane thermometer (TMT). Here is a step-by-step guide:
Step 1: Begin by practicing good hand hygiene to prevent the transmission of microorganisms.
Step 2: Turn on the thermometer and wait until the ready sign appears on the screen to ensure accurate measurement.
Step 3: Slide the probe cover in place to prevent cross-contamination.
Step 4: Instruct the patient to tilt their head to the side for comfort and check for cerumen...
580
Equipments Used to Measure Body Temperature01:13

Equipments Used to Measure Body Temperature

996
Body temperature can be assessed using various devices and measured in Celsius or Fahrenheit.
Glass-bulb Thermometer:
Glass-bulb thermometers are hollow glass tubes with a bulb tip containing liquid such as ethanol or mercury. Historically, glass bulb mercury thermometers were the standard device to measure body temperature. Today, mercury thermometers are prohibited in many countries due to the hazardous effects of mercury and the risk of exposure if the glass bulb breaks. In general,...
996
Assessing Body Temperature - Axilla01:14

Assessing Body Temperature - Axilla

583
Procedural Guide for Assessing Axillary Body Temperature using a Digital Thermometer:
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and put on clean gloves to maintain infection control and prevent cross-contamination.
Step 2: Prepare the patient by explaining the procedure to ensure understanding and cooperation. Ensure privacy, expose the axilla, and inform the patient that minimal movement is crucial for an accurate reading.
Step 3: Adjust the patient’s clothing to expose only the axilla. It minimizes...
583

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Neoplasms of the heart].

Medicina, cirurgia, farmacia·2010
Same author

[Attacks of paroxysmal tachycardia during food intake].

Vida medica·2010
Same author

Radiographic assessment of impacted mandibular third molar sockets filled with composite xenogenic bone graft.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2006
Same author

Simple bone cyst versus odontogenic keratocyst: differential diagnosis by digitized panoramic radiography.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2005
Same author

Mucosal cysts of the maxillary sinus: a literature review.

Medicina oral : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Oral y de la Academia Iberoamericana de Patologia y Medicina Bucal·2001
Same author

Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in populations at low and high risk for sexually transmitted diseases in Rio de Janeiro.

Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz·1993

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Extracting the Cochlea from a Human Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Protocol
06:42

Extracting the Cochlea from a Human Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Protocol

Published on: August 18, 2023

720

Temperature variations during bone removal procedures similar to third molar extraction using different instruments.

G B Bisson1, I M Sanches1, N O Ciaramicolo1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Alameda Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75, Bauru, SP 17012-901, Brazil.

The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
|April 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared bone removal temperatures during third molar extraction. High-speed instruments generated less heat, indicating better bone preservation during oral surgery.

Keywords:
BoneOral surgeryPiezosurgeryTemperatureThird molar

More Related Videos

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
06:18

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains

Published on: November 30, 2021

3.8K
The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model
04:19

The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model

Published on: January 13, 2023

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Extracting the Cochlea from a Human Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Protocol
06:42

Extracting the Cochlea from a Human Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Protocol

Published on: August 18, 2023

720
Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
06:18

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains

Published on: November 30, 2021

3.8K
The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model
04:19

The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model

Published on: January 13, 2023

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Bone removal is crucial in third molar extraction.
  • Heat generated during bone removal can impede bone healing.
  • Understanding instrument-specific temperature variations is vital for optimizing surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate temperature variations during bone removal using different surgical instruments.
  • To compare the thermal effects of high-speed turbine, implant motor, low-speed micromotor, and piezoelectric saw.
  • To assess the impact of rotational speed on intraoperative temperature during bone removal procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Bone removal was performed on pig mandibles around 20 posterior teeth.
  • Constant saline irrigation was maintained using a syringe and needle.
  • Temperature variations and surgical time were recorded for each instrument: high-speed turbine (400,000 rpm), implant motor (100,000 rpm), low-speed micromotor (20,000 rpm), and piezoelectric saw (30 kHz).

Main Results:

  • Mean temperature variations were: 0.96°C (high-speed turbine), 1.38°C (implant motor), 2.22°C (low-speed micromotor), and 2.90°C (piezoelectric saw).
  • Statistically significant differences in temperature variation were found between the high-speed turbine and the micromotor (p=0.009), and between the low-speed micromotor and the piezoelectric saw (p=0.04).
  • Higher rotational speeds correlated with lower temperature variations and reduced surgical time.

Conclusions:

  • Significant differences exist in temperature variations among instruments used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
  • High-speed instruments demonstrate lower temperature increases during bone removal compared to lower-speed or piezoelectric devices.
  • Optimizing instrument selection based on rotational speed can minimize thermal damage and potentially improve bone repair post-extraction.