Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Structural brain changes in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and comorbid depression].

Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova·2023
Same author

The degree of mu rhythm suppression in women is associated with presence of children as well as empathy and anxiety level.

Social neuroscience·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

8.9K

Live vs video interaction: sensorimotor and visual cortical oscillations during action observation.

Ekaterina D Karimova1, Alena S Ovakimian1, Nikita S Katermin2

  • 1Laboratory of Applied Physiology of Human Higher Nervous Activity, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS (IHNA&NPh RAS), 5A Butlerova street, 117485 Moscow, the Russian Federation.

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
|April 28, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Video interactions impair nonverbal perception and concentration. Electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis shows reduced brain activity related to social movement and visual attention during video calls compared to live interactions.

Keywords:
EEG alpha rhythmEEG mu rhythmaction observationmirror neuron systemmu-suppressionvirtual interactions

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
10:45

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions

Published on: July 6, 2011

11.6K
EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

25.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

8.9K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
10:45

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions

Published on: July 6, 2011

11.6K
EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

25.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Modern communication increasingly relies on video interactions across various sectors.
  • Users report difficulties in perceiving nonverbal cues and maintaining concentration during video calls.
  • Understanding the neural basis of these perceptual differences is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of live versus video action observation on brain activity.
  • To analyze electroencephalogram (EEG) oscillations in sensorimotor (mu rhythm) and visual (alpha rhythm) cortices.
  • To determine how interaction modality affects the perception of social movement and visual attention.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 32-channel EEG recordings from 83 healthy volunteers observing actions live and on video.
  • Applied Independent Component Analysis (ICA) for mu and alpha rhythm component selection.
  • Employed Fourier Transform to calculate rhythm suppression indices relative to a baseline.

Main Results:

  • The mu rhythm, reflecting mirror neuron system activity, was sensitive to social movement and differed significantly between live and video conditions.
  • The upper mu-range showed sensitivity to movement type, while the main range was condition-dependent.
  • Alpha rhythm, indicating visual attention, was not movement-dependent but showed stronger initial concentration during live observation.

Conclusions:

  • Live interaction facilitates stronger visual attention compared to video interaction.
  • Subtle social and nonverbal perceptions are potentially diminished in remote video interactions.
  • The findings highlight challenges in replicating the richness of live social cues in digital communication.