Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

10:26
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
3.9K
Teaching scientific evidence and critical thinking for policy making
Natalia Pasternak Taschner1,2, Paulo Almeida2,3
1Center for Science and Society, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Biology Methods & Protocols
|April 29, 2024
Summary
Bridging the gap between science and policy requires formal training for both scientists and policymakers. Developing these skills fosters better evidence-informed decision-making and opens new career paths.
Area of Science:
- Policy Studies
- Science Communication
Background:
- A global push exists to integrate scientific evidence into policymaking.
- However, a significant gap remains in training scientists and policymakers for effective collaboration.
- Current educational systems do not adequately prepare scientists to communicate policy-relevant findings or policymakers to critically assess scientific evidence.
Discussion:
- Formal training programs are essential to bridge the divide between academia and policy sectors.
- Developing specific competencies in evidence utilization and scientific process understanding is crucial for successful interaction.
- The authors share their experience in designing and delivering preliminary courses focused on scientific evidence in policy.
Key Insights:
- Positive feedback indicates a demand for such interdisciplinary training.
- Training enhances the ability of policymakers to understand and utilize scientific evidence.
- This initiative can foster a more collaborative environment between science and policy.
Outlook:
- Future plans include expanding training to science majors to encompass both sides of the dialogue.
- This expansion aims to create new career opportunities at the intersection of science and policy.
- The development of specialized courses can lead to more informed and effective policy outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Critical Thinking
103
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Colleges and universities are...
103
Critical Thinking II
2.8K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.8K
Critical Thinking I
3.3K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
3.3K
Patient-centered Care
2.0K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
2.0K
Inductive Reasoning
60.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.4K
Reasoning
74
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
74

