Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

5.3K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
5.3K
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

106
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
106
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional improvement is a better predictor of steady work than medical improvement for individuals with mental health conditions.

PLOS mental health·2026
Same authorSame journal

Perceptual Expertise of Forensic Examiners and Reviewers on Tests of Cross-Race and Disguised Face Identification and Face Memory.

Applied cognitive psychology·2024
Same author

Regularized Bayesian calibration and scoring of the WD-FAB IRT model improves predictive performance over marginal maximum likelihood.

PloS one·2022
Same author

A ROC-based test for evaluating the group difference with an application to neonatal audiology screening.

Statistics in medicine·2021
Same author

Order-restricted inference for clustered ROC data with application to fingerprint matching accuracy.

Biometrics·2019
Same author

A cluster-adjusted rank-based test for a clinical trial concerning multiple endpoints with application to dietary intervention assessment.

Biometrics·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K

Forensic facial examiners versus super-recognizers: Evaluating behavior beyond accuracy.

Carina A Hahn1, Liansheng Larry Tang2, Amy N Yates1

  • 1Information Access Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

Applied Cognitive Psychology
|April 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Forensic facial examiners and super-recognizers show distinct face matching behaviors. Understanding these differences is key to interpreting their judgments beyond just accuracy.

Keywords:
facial forensicsfacial identificationfacial proficiencyforensic facial examinersuper-recognizer

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

443
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

443
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Forensic Science

Background:

  • Forensic facial examiners and super-recognizers demonstrate high accuracy in face matching.
  • These groups outperform the general population in facial recognition tasks.
  • Facial examiners typically possess extensive training, while super-recognizers exhibit natural aptitude.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the detailed behavioral properties of face matching in forensic facial examiners and super-recognizers.
  • To identify and compare the distinct judgment strategies employed by these two specialist groups.
  • To explore the relationship between confidence, perceived task difficulty, and accuracy in facial expertise.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of behavioral data from forensic facial examiners and super-recognizers during face matching tasks.
  • Evaluation of judgment scale usage, decision confidence, and response symmetry.
  • Assessment of self-reported accuracy insights, including confidence ratings and perceived task ease.

Main Results:

  • Forensic facial examiners utilized the full 7-point identity judgment scale, while super-recognizers favored highly confident decisions.
  • Examiners' judgments were symmetric around the midpoint, unlike super-recognizers'.
  • Examiners exhibited higher identity judgment agreement than super-recognizers, yet both groups showed self-awareness regarding accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Facial expertise is characterized by distinct behavioral patterns beyond mere accuracy.
  • Interpreting facial comparison judgments requires consideration of the individual's expertise type (trained vs. natural).
  • Future evaluations of facial comparison should incorporate behavioral metrics alongside accuracy to fully understand performance.