Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Peer Review and Medical Journals
Kenneth Nugent1, Christopher J Peterson2
1Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Abstract:
Journal editors depend on peer reviewers to make decisions about submitted manuscripts. These reviewers help evaluate the methods, the results, the discussion of the results, and the overall organization and presentation of the manuscript. In addition, reviewers can help identify important mistakes and possible misconduct. Editors frequently have difficulty obtaining enough peer reviews which are submitted in a timely manner. This increases the workload of editors and journal managers and potentially delays the publication of clinical and research studies. This commentary discusses of the importance of peer reviews and make suggestions which potentially can increase the participation of academic faculty and researchers in this important activity.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
Feedback Inhibition
Proofreading
Antibiotic Selection
Allergic Reactions
Cancer

