Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
Published on: August 11, 2023
Transitioning from Faculty-Written Examinations to National Board of Medical Examiners Custom Examinations in Medical
Christine M Prater1, Thomas E Tenner1,2, Michael P Blanton1,2
1Department of Medical Education, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA.
Purpose:
A challenge for medical educators is choosing a method that best evaluates preclinical students' performance in preparation for Step 1. In previous years, block directors (BDs) of the 2nd year (MS2) neuroscience course at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine issued faculty-written (FW) examinations during the course. In 2022, BDs replaced FW examinations with National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) custom examinations. The rationale being that the customized NBME exams would better reflect the national neuroscience curriculum and enhance student preparedness for taking standardized exams.
Methods:
FW examinations (2021) were created by the faculty in the neuroscience course and reviewed by BDs. In contrast, questions that best aligned with the material covered for the 2022 course were selected by BDs using MyNBMESM Services Portal. The custom questions selected are assigned a "difficulty" score by NBME, generating a predicted national average score. At the end of the course, undergraduate medical students in the School of Medicine at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center completed an online Qualtrics questionnaire to compare the transition of assessment type.
Results:
Participants reported greater satisfaction in their neuroscience education and block organization with NBME examinations. For example, there was a nearly twofold (1.83) increase in the number of students that strongly agreed with the statement "Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of my neuroscience education in this block." They were also less likely to report the workload as being "much too heavy." Overall, students expressed a preference for the customized NBME exams as opposed to faculty generated exams (88.1%).
Conclusions:
From the student perspective, building customized assessments through MyNBMESM Services Portal was found to be useful and preferable for evaluating student performance. From block directors' perspective, it is noted that time is saved assisting faculty in writing valid questions, time defending/justifying FW questions, and time expended generating exams. The only perceived negative regarding the NBME exams is the cost.
More Related Videos
00:08A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Drug Regulation
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR