Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
The outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty for instability
Rit Apinyankul1, Cierra Hong2, Katherine L Hwang2
1Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Recurrent dislocation after revision hip replacement is common. Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades, BMI, specialized liners, lumbopelvic stiffness, and abductor weakness increase risk.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Instability is a frequent reason for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- Recurrent dislocation can occur even after initial revision THA.
- Identifying risk factors for recurrent dislocation is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the risk of recurrent dislocation following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for instability.
- To identify patient and surgical factors associated with recurrent dislocation after revision THA.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 163 patients undergoing revision THA for instability between 2009-2019 was analyzed.
- Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate risk factors, considering death and infection as competing events.
- Patient-reported outcomes included VR-12, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and HOOS, JR.
Main Results:
- The cumulative incidence of recurrent dislocation was 8.7% at 1 year, 18.8% at 5 years, and 31.9% at 10 years.
- Significant risk factors included high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, BMI 25-30 kg/m², specialized liners, lumbopelvic stiffness, and abductor weakness.
- Increasing acetabular component size by >1 mm reduced dislocation risk (HR 0.89).
Conclusions:
- Patients undergoing revision THA for instability face a substantial risk of recurrent dislocation.
- Higher ASA grade, overweight status, prior lumbopelvic fusion, specialized liners, and postoperative abductor weakness are key risk factors.
- Optimizing component size and addressing identified risk factors may help mitigate recurrent dislocations.
More Related Videos
07:45The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022