Value of dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion in CAD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yuma Kawaguchi1, Shingo Kato1, Nobuyuki Horita2

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.

Insights

Dynamic CT perfusion accurately detects myocardial ischemia, aiding in coronary artery disease assessment. This non-invasive method shows high diagnostic performance and prognostic value for adverse events in patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Diagnostic Accuracy

Background:

  • Myocardial ischemia quantification is crucial for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD).
  • Dynamic computed tomography (CT) perfusion offers a non-invasive approach to assess myocardial blood flow (MBF).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic CT perfusion for detecting significant CAD.
  • To assess the prognostic value of dynamic CT perfusion in risk stratification of CAD patients.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library.
  • Meta-analysis of 23 studies comparing dynamic CT perfusion with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).
  • Evaluation of diagnostic performance using summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves and pooled hazard ratios.

Main Results:

  • Dynamic CT perfusion demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (AUC=0.92, sensitivity=0.82, specificity=0.86) for detecting myocardial ischemia.
  • MBF was significantly lower in ischemic regions (0.92 mL/min/g) compared to non-ischemic regions (1.39 mL/min/g).
  • The method showed prognostic value, with a pooled hazard ratio of 4.98 for predicting adverse events.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamic CT perfusion is a highly accurate non-invasive tool for quantifying myocardial ischemia and detecting functional significance.
  • The technique shows potential for risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease.
  • Diagnostic performance was consistent across different CT scanner types and patient body mass indices.
Abstract