Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

345
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
345
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

133
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
133
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

125
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
125
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

125
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
125
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

178
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
178
Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

5.5K
Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability of cancer screening questions from the National Health Interview Survey.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Multi-arm multi-stage platform trials for neurological disease: accelerating progress.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Sample Size Calculation for the ROCI Design.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Outcomes of adolescents and young adults (AYA) attending for fertility counselling and oocyte cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic treatment.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2026
Same author

Evaluating the basis for use of advanced stage as a surrogate endpoint for cancer mortality in screening trials: a simulation study of meta-correlation and an alternative framework.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

A Roadmap to Transform Lung Cancer Outcomes: Priorities in Biology, Therapeutic Innovation, Early Detection, Prevention, and Interception.

Cancer discovery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

8.7K

Considerations for using potential surrogate endpoints in cancer screening trials.

Alexis B Webb1, Christine D Berg2, Philip E Castle3

  • 1Cancer Research UK, London, UK.

The Lancet. Oncology
|May 2, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Developing novel cancer screening tests is hindered by expensive, long-term trials. Surrogate endpoints offer a solution by measuring earlier outcomes than cancer mortality, but validation remains challenging.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
10:27

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts

Published on: July 25, 2020

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

8.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
10:27

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts

Published on: July 25, 2020

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Large-scale, decade-long cancer screening trials are costly and slow down innovation.
  • Novel screening tests face significant barriers to development, commercialization, and implementation.
  • Cancer mortality is the ultimate endpoint, but it occurs much later than screening interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the challenges in selecting and utilizing surrogate endpoints for cancer screening trials.
  • To propose criteria for the appropriate use of surrogate endpoints in cancer screening.
  • To identify potential surrogate endpoint candidates for cancer screening.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current landscape and challenges in surrogate endpoint use.
  • Analysis of lessons learned and shortcomings from therapeutic trial settings.
  • Discussion of candidate surrogate endpoints against defined research and regulatory criteria.

Main Results:

  • Significant challenges exist in validating surrogate endpoints, even with robust study designs.
  • The current landscape of surrogate endpoint use in cancer screening is complex.
  • Lessons from therapeutic trials highlight both potential and pitfalls of surrogate endpoints.

Conclusions:

  • Surrogate endpoints are a potential strategy to accelerate cancer screening test development.
  • Rigorous validation is crucial but difficult for surrogate endpoints in cancer screening.
  • Further research is needed to identify and validate suitable surrogate endpoints for regulatory acceptance.