Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
Published on: December 16, 2016
Comparative microplastic analysis in urban waters using μ-FTIR and Py-GC-MS: A case study in Amsterdam
Feride Öykü Sefiloglu1, Cleo N Stratmann2, Marthinus Brits1
1Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
This study compared microplastic (MP) quantification methods in Amsterdam canals. Micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry showed comparable mass concentration trends for microplastics.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Microplastic (MP) contamination is a global issue in freshwater systems.
- Current MP analysis often focuses on particle numbers, underutilizing spectroscopic methods for mass estimation.
- Accurate MP mass quantification is crucial for understanding environmental impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare micro Fourier-transform infrared (μ-FTIR) imaging and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) for identifying and quantifying microplastics in urban water.
- To assess the comparability of these techniques for both particle number and mass concentration measurements.
- To investigate microplastic abundance in Amsterdam's canals, considering location and season.
Main Methods:
- Two sampling campaigns (summer and winter) were conducted in the Amsterdam canal network.
- An in-situ volume-reducing pump collected surface water microplastics (10-300 μm).
- Microplastics were analyzed using μ-FTIR imaging and Py-GC-MS for particle number and mass concentration.
Main Results:
- Microplastic concentrations ranged from 16-107 MP/m³.
- Mass concentrations estimated by μ-FTIR were 2.0-789 μg/m³, and by Py-GC-MS were 8.5-754 μg/m³.
- Both methods showed comparable trends in MP abundance, with variations attributed to inter-methodological differences. Higher concentrations were found in the city center, with seasonal variations noted in high-activity areas.
Conclusions:
- μ-FTIR imaging and Py-GC-MS provide comparable results for microplastic mass concentration in urban water.
- Microplastic pollution is elevated in urban centers, with seasonal influences in areas of high human activity.
- Further research is needed to refine and standardize microplastic mass quantification techniques.
More Related Videos
05:31Sampling, Sorting, and Characterizing Microplastics in Aquatic Environments with High Suspended Sediment Loads and Large Floating Debris
Published on: July 28, 2018
05:05Quantification of Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate-based Micro- and Nano-plastics from Soil Using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Microbial Bioremediation of Plastics