Pacemaker Implantation Following Heart Transplantation - Incidence and Risk Factors. Single-Center Experience

Anna Boluk1, Mateusz Sokolski2, Mateusz Rakowski1

  • 1Institute of Heart Disease, Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland.

PubMed

Insights

Pacemaker implantation is common after heart transplantation (HTx), particularly with the bicaval technique. Higher donor age and BMI increase the risk of needing a pacemaker post-HTx.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Surgery

Background:

  • Bradyarrhythmias are frequent complications after orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx).
  • Pacemaker (PM) implantation is often required to manage these conduction disorders.
  • Current HTx techniques include the bicaval and total heart transplantation methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of conduction disorders requiring PM implantation post-HTx.
  • To identify risk factors, including donor parameters and surgical techniques, associated with these disorders.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 111 heart transplant recipients was analyzed.
  • Patients were categorized into those requiring PM implantation and those who did not.
  • Donor parameters, graft ischemia, transport times, and surgical techniques were compared between groups.

Main Results:

  • 9% of HTx patients (10 out of 111) required PM implantation.
  • Sinus node dysfunction and complete atrioventricular block were the primary indications for PMs.
  • Higher donor age (48 vs. 40 years) and BMI (28 vs. 26 kg/m²) were significantly associated with PM need.
  • The bicaval anastomosis technique was used in all PM-requiring patients (100%) versus 70% in the non-PM group (P=0.044).

Conclusions:

  • Pacemaker implantation remains a common necessity post-HTx, even with advanced surgical methods.
  • The bicaval technique is associated with a higher incidence of bradyarrhythmias requiring pacing.
  • Increased donor age and BMI are significant risk factors for PM implantation, relevant given evolving donor heart selection criteria.
Abstract