Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Electrochemiluminescence Assays for Human Islet Autoantibodies
Published on: March 23, 2018
Clinical Impact of New Reference Intervals for the Roche Prolactin II Immunoassay
Erin Earll1, Bradley R Javorsky2,3, Jenna Sarvaideo2,3
1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
New reference intervals for the Roche prolactin immunoassay can reduce unnecessary testing and costs. Establishing higher Roche prolactin limits avoids misdiagnosis in healthy patients.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Endocrinology
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- The Roche prolactin immunoassay often reports higher values than the Siemens assay, despite similar manufacturer-defined reference intervals.
- This discrepancy causes diagnostic confusion, with patient results frequently exceeding Roche's upper limit but remaining within Siemens' range.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish new, accurate reference intervals for both Roche and Siemens prolactin immunoassays.
- To evaluate the impact of revised Roche assay intervals on diagnostic practices and patient care.
Main Methods:
- New reference intervals were established using 374 specimens from healthy outpatients.
- A chart review assessed unnecessary testing and treatment in 298 patients with Roche prolactin values above the manufacturer's upper limit but below the newly established limit.
Main Results:
- New upper limits for the Roche assay were determined as 37.8 ng/mL (females) and 22.8 ng/mL (males), significantly higher than manufacturer limits (23.3 ng/mL and 15.2 ng/mL).
- Siemens assay intervals matched manufacturer recommendations. No clinically significant prolactin excess was found in patients between the old Roche limit and the new one.
- Unnecessary evaluations included 459 repeat tests, 57 macroprolactin tests, 39 MRIs, 28 endocrine referrals, and 11 patients treated with dopamine agonists, costing at least $34,134 in excess care.
Conclusions:
- Adopting the new Roche prolactin assay upper limits (37.8 ng/mL females, 22.8 ng/mL males) would not impede diagnosis of significant pituitary tumors.
- Implementing these revised limits would substantially decrease unnecessary patient evaluations and associated healthcare costs for individuals without pathophysiologic prolactin excess.
More Related Videos
08:48Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
Published on: February 16, 2022
08:29Validated Immunochemical Assay for Comprehensive Determination of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Released from and Bound to Cells
Published on: May 9, 2025