A survey of multiple candidate probiotic bacteria reveals specificity in the ability to modify the effects of key...

We have evaluated the inhibitory effects of supernatants and lysates derived from several candidate probiotics, on the growth and biofilm formation of wound pathogens, and their ability to protect human primary epidermal keratinocytes from the toxic effects of pathogens. Supernatants (neutralized and non-neutralized) and lysates (via sonication) from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Bifidobacterium longum, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, and Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 were tested for their inhibitory effects against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumanni. The supernatants of L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, B. longum, and L. rhamnosus GG reduced the growth of S. aureus, E. coli, and A. baumanni. B. longum additionally inhibited P. aeruginosa growth. However, neutralized Lactobacillus supernatants did not inhibit growth and in some cases were stimulatory. Lysates of L. plantarum and L. reuteri inhibited S. pyogenes while B. longum lysates inhibited E. coli and S. aureus growth. E. coli Nissle 1917 lysates enhanced the growth of S. pyogenes and P. aeruginosa. Biofilm formation by E. coli was reduced by lysates of L. reuteri and neutralized supernatants of all candidate probiotics. P. aeruginosa biofilm formation was reduced by E. coli Nissle supernatant but increased by L. plantarum, L. reuteri, and Bifidobacterium longum lysates. L. reuteri decreased the toxic effects of S. aureus on keratinocytes while E. coli Nissle 1917 lysates protected keratinocytes from S. pyogenes toxicity. In conclusion, lactobacilli and E. coli Nissle lysates confer inhibitory effects on pathogenic growth independently of acidification and may beneficially alter the outcome of interactions between host cell-pathogen in a species-specific manner.IMPORTANCEOne of the attributes of probiotics is their ability to inhibit pathogens. For this reason, many lactobacilli have been investigated for their effects as potential topical therapeutics against skin pathogens. However, this field is in its infancy. Even though probiotics are known to be safe when taken orally, the potential safety concerns when applied to potentially compromised skin are unknown. For this reason, we believe that extracts of probiotics will offer advantages over the use of live bacteria. In this study, we have surveyed five candidate probiotics, when used as extracts, in terms of their effects against common wound pathogens. Our data demonstrate that some probiotic extracts promote the growth of pathogens and highlight the need for careful selection of species and strains when probiotics are to be used topically.