Costs and health care resource utilization among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Tsung-Ying Lee1, Abree Johnson1, Catherine E Cooke1

  • 1Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Insights

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) care costs were higher than non-CLL care, driven by provider and prescription drug expenses. Some CLL patients utilized fewer routine services but more acute care, impacting patient burden.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Health Economics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent leukemia.
  • Existing studies on CLL costs often lack comparator groups or focus narrowly on specific treatments.
  • A comprehensive view of CLL-related utilization across care settings is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Quantify healthcare costs and resource utilization for Medicare beneficiaries with CLL.
  • Identify predictors of economic outcomes in CLL patients.
  • Compare CLL patient costs and utilization to a matched non-CLL cohort.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of a 20% Medicare sample (2017-2019).
  • Matched cohorts: 2,736 CLL patients vs. 13,571 non-CLL patients.
  • Generalized linear models used to assess costs and healthcare resource utilization.

Main Results:

  • Annual costs were higher for CLL patients ($22,781) versus non-CLL ($13,901), primarily due to provider and Part D drug costs.
  • Key utilization included physician visits, oncologist/hematologist visits, and lab services.
  • Older adults (85+) and non-metropolitan residents showed distinct patterns of acute vs. routine care utilization.

Conclusions:

  • CLL care incurs significantly higher healthcare costs compared to non-CLL care.
  • Variations in routine versus acute care utilization exist among CLL patients, particularly by age and location.
  • Further research is warranted to understand the implications of these utilization patterns on patient burden.
Abstract