Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025
A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
Published on: May 11, 2020
Accurate placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using a handheld iOS-based navigation device: a prospective
Mark P Arts1, Geert Lycklama À Nijeholt2, Eddie Van Eeckhoven3
1Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 432, 2501 CK, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Background:
Accurate pedicle screw placement is a challenge with reported misplacement rates of 10% and higher. A handheld navigation device (HND) may provide accuracy equal to CT-based navigation (CT-Nav) but without the cost and complexity.
Objective:
To study the accuracy of a handheld navigation device for pedicle screw placement.
Study Design:
This prospective cross-sectional study with consistently applied reference standard enrolled 20 patients undergoing 92 pedicle screw placements.
Patients:
Patients who underwent pedicle screw placement between May 2022 and September 2022.
Outcome Measures:
Pedicle screw placement accuracy per Gertzbein-Robbins.
Methods:
Once the screw pilot hole was established, the proposed trajectory of the HND was compared with that proposed by CT-Nav. Postoperatively, screw accuracy was graded according to Gertzbein-Robbins by a blinded radiologist based on CT scans. Accuracy was compared between the two systems and published control for fluoroscopy assisted and CT-Nav placement using Bayesian posterior distribution.
Results:
The trajectory proposed by the HND and CT-Nav were in agreement in 98.9% (95% Exact CI; 94.09%-99.97%). The HND accuracy was 98.9% with 91 screws rated "A" and 1 rated "C". Noninferiority to fluoroscopic placement was achieved because the one-sided normal-approximation 95% CI Lower Bound (LB) of 95.3% is greater than the Performance Goal (PG) of 83.4%. Posthoc analysis demonstrated that the probability of superiority of the HND relative to the historical accuracy rate of 91.5% for fluoroscopy assisted procedures is >0.999 and that the HND's accuracy rate is within 4.5% of CT-Nav of 95.5% is >0.999. No adverse events or intra-operative complications associated with HND were observed. There was 1 (1.1%) intra-operative repositioning and no reoperations for any reason.
Conclusions:
The accuracy rate of the HND was 98.9%, and the proposed trajectory matched with CT-Nav in 98.9% of the time. This is superior to the historical published accuracy rate for fluoroscopy-assisted procedures and equivalent to the historical published accuracy rate for CT-Nav.
Clinical Trial Registration Number:
Dutch trial register NL74268.058.20.
