Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Comparison between transcatheter versus surgical intervention for pediatric aortic valvular stenosis: a multicenter
Jun Muneuchi1, Ayako Kuraoka2, Yusaku Nagatomo3
1Department of Pediatrics, Kyushu Hospital, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, 1-8-1, Kishinoura, Yahatanishi-Ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 806-8501, Japan. jmune@msn.com.
Insights
For pediatric aortic valvular stenosis, both balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and surgical aortic valvuloplasty (SAV) show similar long-term survival and reintervention rates. This study compared outcomes for children undergoing either BAV or SAV for vAS.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Congenital Heart Disease
Background:
- Aortic valvular stenosis (vAS) in children presents a treatment dilemma regarding initial intervention.
- Transcatheter balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) and surgical aortic valvuloplasty (SAV) are primary treatment options.
- Outcomes comparing BAV and SAV in pediatric vAS require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term outcomes of transcatheter balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) versus surgical aortic valvuloplasty (SAV) in pediatric patients with isolated aortic valvular stenosis (vAS).
- To analyze differences in survival rates, need for reintervention, and rates of valve replacement between BAV and SAV groups.
- To identify factors influencing freedom from reintervention and valve replacement.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective case-control study involving 73 children (<15 years) with vAS from 4 tertiary congenital heart centers.
- Comparison of 10-year survival, reintervention, and prosthetic/autograft valve replacement rates between BAV and SAV cohorts.
- Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to control for confounding variables.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in 10-year survival (BAV: 88% vs. SAV: 92%), reintervention rates (BAV: 58% vs. SAV: 31%), or valve replacement (BAV: 21% vs. SAV: 19%) between BAV and SAV groups.
- Freedom from reintervention correlated with aortic annulus z-score (HR 0.66, P=0.005).
- Freedom from valve replacement correlated with post-intervention aortic regurgitation (HR 4.58, P=0.027).
- Propensity score-matched analysis (N=16) confirmed no significant differences in survival or reintervention rates.
Conclusions:
- Both BAV and SAV offer acceptable long-term survival for pediatric vAS.
- Rates of freedom from reintervention and valve replacement are comparable between BAV and SAV.
- Aortic annulus size and degree of aortic regurgitation are significant factors influencing long-term outcomes.
Abstract:
It is controversial whether children with isolated aortic valvular stenosis (vAS) initially undergo transcatheter or surgical aortic valvuloplasty (BAV or SAV). This multicenter retrospective case-control study aimed to explore outcomes after BAV or SAV for pediatric vAS. We studied children (aged < 15 years) with vAS treated at 4 tertiary congenital heart centers, and compared the rates of survival, reintervention, and valve replacement between patients with BAV and SAV. A total of 73 subjects (BAV: N = 52, SAV: N = 21) were studied. Age and aortic annulus z-score at the first presentation were 85 (26-530) days and - 0.45 (- 1.51-0.59), respectively. During the follow-up period of 121 (47-185) months, rates of 10-year survival (BAV: 88% vs. SAV: 92%, P = 0.477), reintervention (BAV: 58% vs. SAV: 31%, P = 0.626), and prosthetic/autograft valve replacement (BAV: 21% vs. SAV: 19%, P = 0.563) did not differ between the groups. Freedom from reintervention rate significantly correlated with aortic annulus z-score (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.88, P = 0.005), and freedom from prosthetic/autograft valve replacement rate significantly correlated to the degree of aortic regurgitation after the first intervention (HR: 4.58, 95% CI 1.19-17.71, P = 0.027). Propensity score-matched analysis (N = 16) did not show the differences in survival and reintervention rates between the groups. Long-term survival was acceptable, and the rates of freedom from reintervention and prosthetic/autograft valve replacement were comparable between children with vAS who underwent BAV and SAV.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

