Quantifying myocardial active strain energy density: A comparative analysis of analytic and finite element methods...

This study compared commonly used methods for calculating left ventricular wall stress with the finite element analysis and evaluated different approaches to strain estimation. We sought to improve the accuracy of contractance estimation by developing a novel stress equation.

Multiple methods for calculating LV contractile stress and strain exist. Contractance is derived from stress and strain information and is a measure of myocardial work per unit volume of muscle. Precise stress and strain information are essential for its accurate evaluation.

We compared widely used methods for stress and strain calculations across diverse clinical scenarios representing distinct types of left ventricular myocardial disease. Our analysis revealed significant discrepancies in both the stress and strain values obtained with different methods. However, a newly developed modified version of the Mirsky equation demonstrated close agreement with the finite element analysis results for circumferential stress, while the Lamé method produced results close to those of finite element analysis for longitudinal stress and improved contractance accuracy.

This study highlights significant inconsistencies in stress and strain values calculated using different methods, emphasising the potential impact on contractance calculations and subsequent clinical interpretation. We recommend adopting the Lamé method for longitudinal stress assessment and the modified Mirsky equation for circumferential stress analysis. These methods offer a balance between accuracy and feasibility, making them advantageous for clinical practice. By adopting these recommendations, we can improve the accuracy of LV wall stress and strain estimates, leading to more dependable contractance calculations, better prognostication and improved clinical decisions.

Accurately estimating myocardial stress and strain is of paramount significance in clinical practice because the calculation of the contractance, defined and quantified by myocardial active strain energy density, necessitates correct stress and strain data. Contractance, which assesses myocardial work per unit muscle volume, has emerged as a promising indicator of contractile function and a predictor of future risk. The new recommendations for calculating myocardial stress improve the reliability of calculating contractance and enhance the understanding of myocardial diseases.