Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Assessing the Particulate Matter Removal Abilities of Tree Leaves
Published on: October 7, 2018
Leveraging physics-based and explainable machine learning approaches to quantify the relative contributions of rain
1Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
A quantitative understanding of the roles of rainfall and pollutant concentrations in wet deposition is important because they critically influence terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. However, their relative contributions to wet deposition, which vary across regions, have not yet been identified. We propose two methods that quantitatively separate the contributions of rain and pollutant concentrations to wet deposition: one is based on simplified equations describing the wet scavenging of pollutants and the other is based on random forest models employing SHapley Additive exPlanations. Three-dimensional long-term air quality simulations from 2003 to 2019 are used as inputs for both the physics-based and machine learning models. Remarkably, the results drawn from the explainable machine learning model are consistent with those from the physics-based approach: overall, rain is a more important limiting factor than pollutant concentrations and the relative contribution of rain is larger than that of pollutants by up to a factor of 3-4 in polluted regions. In polluted regions, pollutant concentrations can remain relatively high even in the presence of precipitation owing to continuous and intense emissions; therefore, wet deposition is limited by rainfall. The contribution of rainfall is larger by 1.5-2.5 than that of pollutant concentrations in regions even with low emissions and this considerably large role of rain suggests that regional or transboundary pollutant transport plays a key role in modulating wet deposition. However, in very remote regions, once the rainfall amount exceeds a certain value, rainfall no longer contributes to increasing wet deposition because atmospheric pollutants are readily removed by rain. So, the contributions of the two factors are comparable in pristine regions. Our results can serve as a basis for explaining interannual variations in wet deposition and for future projections of wet deposition under emission control plans and climate change scenarios across regions.
More Related Videos
13:27Exploring the Effects of Atmospheric Forcings on Evaporation: Experimental Integration of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Shallow Subsurface
Published on: June 8, 2015
06:26Capturing Flow-weighted Water and Suspended Particulates from Agricultural Canals During Drainage Events
Published on: November 7, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Gravimetry: Overview
In precipitation gravimetry, the analyte is converted into a precipitate and weighed. For example, the silver content in a sample can be estimated by precipitating and...
Precipitation Gravimetry
In determining nickel by gravimetric analysis, a precipitant of ethanolic dimethylglyoxime is added to a hot nickel salt solution. This is quickly followed by the dropwise addition of dilute ammonia solution until precipitation occurs. A...
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Descriptions
The Eulerian method focuses on fixed points in space where fluid properties, such as velocity, pressure, and temperature, are observed as the fluid moves between these...
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Precipitate Formation and Particle Size Control
The obtained precipitate should be either a pure substance of known composition or easily converted to one by a simple process, such as ignition or drying. In addition, the precipitate should be insoluble and easily filterable. In general, filterability...