Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Systemic Delivery of MicroRNA Using Recombinant Adeno-associated Virus Serotype 9 to Treat Neuromuscular Diseases in Rodents
Published on: August 10, 2018
Long-Term Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Risdiplam and Nusinersen in Children with Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Christos Kokaliaris1, Rachel Evans2, Neil Hawkins2,3
1F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland. christos.kokaliaris@roche.com.
Insights
Risdiplam demonstrated superior long-term efficacy and safety compared to nusinersen for treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 in children. This analysis provides crucial data for healthcare decisions in managing this severe genetic neuromuscular disease.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Genetics
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe genetic neuromuscular disorder leading to motor neuron loss and progressive muscle weakness.
- Type 1 SMA is particularly severe, with affected children unable to sit independently and facing a high mortality rate before age 2 without intervention.
- Current treatment options lack direct comparative trials, necessitating indirect comparisons for informed healthcare decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of risdiplam versus nusinersen in pediatric patients with type 1 SMA.
- To conduct an indirect treatment comparison to mitigate bias from differing baseline characteristics between treatment groups.
- To provide evidence for healthcare decision-making regarding SMA treatment options.
Main Methods:
- An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed.
- Data from 58 children treated with risdiplam in the FIREFISH trial were analyzed.
- Published aggregate data from 81 children treated with nusinersen in the ENDEAR and SHINE trials (≥36 months follow-up) were utilized.
Main Results:
- Risdiplam treatment was associated with a 78% reduction in mortality rate and an 81% reduction in the rate of death or permanent ventilation compared to nusinersen.
- A 57% reduction in serious adverse events was observed with risdiplam versus nusinersen.
- Children on risdiplam showed a 45% higher rate of achieving a motor milestone response (HINE Module 2) and a 186% higher rate of significant improvement on the CHOP-INTEND scale.
Conclusions:
- Long-term data suggest risdiplam is a superior treatment option compared to nusinersen for children with type 1 SMA.
- The findings support risdiplam's efficacy in improving motor function and survival outcomes.
- This indirect comparison provides valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of available SMA therapies.
Introduction:
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe genetic neuromuscular disease characterized by a loss of motor neurons and progressive muscle weakness. Children with untreated type 1 SMA never sit independently and require increasing levels of ventilatory support as the disease progresses. Without intervention, and lacking ventilatory support, death typically occurs before the age of 2 years. There are currently no head-to-head trials comparing available treatments in SMA. Indirect treatment comparisons are therefore needed to provide information on the relative efficacy and safety of SMA treatments for healthcare decision-making.
Methods:
The long-term efficacy and safety of risdiplam versus nusinersen in children with type 1 SMA was evaluated using indirect treatment comparison methodology to adjust for differences between population baseline characteristics, to reduce any potential bias in the comparative analysis. An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using risdiplam data from 58 children in FIREFISH (NCT02913482) and published aggregate nusinersen data from 81 children obtained from the ENDEAR (NCT02193074) and SHINE (NCT02594124) clinical trials with at least 36 months of follow-up.
Results:
Children with type 1 SMA treated with risdiplam had a 78% reduction in the rate of death, an 81% reduction in the rate of death or permanent ventilation, and a 57% reduction in the rate of serious adverse events compared with children treated with nusinersen. Children treated with risdiplam also had a 45% higher rate of achieving a Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination, Module 2 motor milestone response and a 186% higher rate of achieving a ≥ 4-point improvement in Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders compared with children treated with nusinersen.
Conclusion:
Long-term data supported risdiplam as a superior alternative to nusinersen in children with type 1 SMA. Video abstract available for this article. Video abstract (MP4 184542 KB).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs,...

