Long-Term Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Risdiplam and Nusinersen in Children with Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Christos Kokaliaris1, Rachel Evans2, Neil Hawkins2,3

  • 1F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland. christos.kokaliaris@roche.com.

PubMed

Insights

Risdiplam demonstrated superior long-term efficacy and safety compared to nusinersen for treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 in children. This analysis provides crucial data for healthcare decisions in managing this severe genetic neuromuscular disease.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Genetics
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe genetic neuromuscular disorder leading to motor neuron loss and progressive muscle weakness.
  • Type 1 SMA is particularly severe, with affected children unable to sit independently and facing a high mortality rate before age 2 without intervention.
  • Current treatment options lack direct comparative trials, necessitating indirect comparisons for informed healthcare decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of risdiplam versus nusinersen in pediatric patients with type 1 SMA.
  • To conduct an indirect treatment comparison to mitigate bias from differing baseline characteristics between treatment groups.
  • To provide evidence for healthcare decision-making regarding SMA treatment options.

Main Methods:

  • An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed.
  • Data from 58 children treated with risdiplam in the FIREFISH trial were analyzed.
  • Published aggregate data from 81 children treated with nusinersen in the ENDEAR and SHINE trials (≥36 months follow-up) were utilized.

Main Results:

  • Risdiplam treatment was associated with a 78% reduction in mortality rate and an 81% reduction in the rate of death or permanent ventilation compared to nusinersen.
  • A 57% reduction in serious adverse events was observed with risdiplam versus nusinersen.
  • Children on risdiplam showed a 45% higher rate of achieving a motor milestone response (HINE Module 2) and a 186% higher rate of significant improvement on the CHOP-INTEND scale.

Conclusions:

  • Long-term data suggest risdiplam is a superior treatment option compared to nusinersen for children with type 1 SMA.
  • The findings support risdiplam's efficacy in improving motor function and survival outcomes.
  • This indirect comparison provides valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of available SMA therapies.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants01:28

Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants

Skeletal muscle relaxants are a group of drugs that can reduce muscle stiffness and induce temporary paralysis to relieve pain. These agents can act centrally to reduce muscle tone or spasms in painful conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or spinal injuries; they are called antispasmodics or spasmolytics.
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin01:26

Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin

Directly acting muscle relaxants like dantrolene and botulinum toxin (BoNT) have distinct mechanisms and applications. Dantrolene, a hydantoin derivative, acts on the ryanodine receptor (RYR1) in skeletal muscle cells. RYR1 are calcium channels present at the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane. In response to excitation, they release calcium ions from the sarcoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol. Calcium promotes actin-myosin-mediated contraction of muscles.
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects01:21

Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects

Skeletal muscle relaxants are widely used for muscle paralysis and relieving pain following any muscle injury or stiffness. However, depending on the drug type, they can have adverse effects that range from mild to severe. Usually, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers have minimal side effects. For example, drugs like d-tubocurarine, cisatracurium, and rocuronium cause hypotension, whereas drugs like baclofen, when stopped abruptly, can lead to the recurrence of spastic conditions.
Unlike...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses01:31

Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses

Skeletal muscle relaxants are used to relax muscle tone and alleviate painful muscle contractions. However, the choice of skeletal muscle relaxants depends on the duration of the surgical procedure in order to minimize potential side effects. Skeletal muscle relaxants like neuromuscular blocking agents [NMBAs] are commonly employed as adjuvants alongside general anesthetics in clinical settings. NMBAs are also used to maintain controlled ventilation during surgery of the larynx or pharynx as...
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison01:09

Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison

Skeletal muscle relaxants can target the central nervous system [CNS] to reduce muscle tension or act directly at the neuromuscular junction to induce temporary paralysis. These two classes of muscle relaxants are called centrally acting muscle relaxants and peripherally acting muscle relaxants. They differ in their action, mechanism, administration route, and clinical uses.
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs,...