Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration
Published on: June 7, 2024
Causes of macrophyte mass development and management recommendations
Susanne C Schneider1, Julie A Coetzee2, Elena Fukasawa Galvanese3
1Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Økernveien 94, 0579 Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway.
Aquatic plant (macrophyte) overgrowth is often managed by removal, but this study suggests the "do nothing" approach may be best. Understanding macrophyte impacts and management costs is key for ecosystem health.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Environmental Management
- Ecosystem Services
Background:
- Aquatic plants (macrophytes) are vital for ecosystem health but can proliferate, leading to management challenges.
- Current macrophyte removal practices are costly, ineffective due to regrowth, and poorly understood regarding ecological impacts.
- Gaps exist in understanding macrophyte development causes, public nuisance perception, and removal effects on ecosystems.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate causes of macrophyte mass developments.
- Assess public perception of nuisance macrophyte growths.
- Evaluate the ecological and societal impacts of macrophyte removal versus non-intervention.
Main Methods:
- Conducted in situ experiments and questionnaires across six diverse aquatic sites on three continents.
- Analyzed ecosystem services and derived monetary values for different management scenarios.
- Developed a decision support system for managing water bodies with excessive macrophyte growth.
Main Results:
- Macrophyte blooms often occur in unintentionally created ideal habitats, sometimes even with low nutrient levels if ecosystem disturbance is reduced.
- Public perception of nuisance varies, with visitors finding it less bothersome than residents.
- Macrophyte removal impacts water levels, water quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and biodiversity, with effects contingent on ecosystem specifics.
- Management interventions often have minimal impact on overall ecosystem societal value.
Conclusions:
- The
- do nothing
- approach should be seriously considered for managing nuisance macrophyte developments.
- Effective management requires understanding site-specific conditions and balancing ecological, social, and economic factors.
- Decision support systems can aid in selecting appropriate macrophyte management strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Primary Production
Bioremediation
Responses to Salt Stress

