Levelling the playing field through the London Network of the UK clinical trials accelerator platform

Jessie Matthews1, Rebecca Dobra1, Gemma Wilson1

  • 1Royal Brompton Hospital, Part of Guy's & St Thomas' Trust, London, UK.

Insights

The UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust's Clinical Trials Accelerator Platform (CTAP) improved access to clinical trials for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients across London. This national initiative enhanced trial availability and participation by fostering collaboration among CF centers.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Clinical Trials
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a severe genetic disorder impacting multiple organ systems and reducing life expectancy.
  • Despite therapeutic advancements, a cure for CF remains elusive, necessitating ongoing clinical research.
  • Numerous novel therapies are in development, with many clinical trials underway globally.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust's Clinical Trials Accelerator Platform (CTAP) in improving trial access for CF patients.
  • To assess the collaborative efforts of London-based CF centers within the CTAP network.
  • To identify strengths and areas for improvement in clinical trial delivery for chronic diseases.

Main Methods:

  • Formation of a sub-network of four large and two smaller specialist CF centers in London.
  • Implementation of a consortium-style collaboration to ensure equitable trial access and knowledge sharing.
  • Review of practices through working group meetings and an online survey after four years of operation.

Main Results:

  • The CTAP initiative successfully brought together 25 UK CF centers to enhance patient participation in clinical trials.
  • The London sub-network facilitated broader trial portfolios and increased study options for UK patients.
  • The review identified key strengths and areas for improvement in the CTAP program's operational practices.

Conclusions:

  • The CTAP model demonstrates a successful national strategy for increasing access to CF clinical trials.
  • Collaborative networks of specialist centers can improve research delivery and patient equity in chronic disease management.
  • The findings offer valuable insights for other regions and chronic diseases aiming to enhance clinical trial participation.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
8.5K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.7K
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
4.8K
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
430