Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
Published on: July 31, 2016
Individuals lack the ability to accurately detect emotional piloerection
Jonathon McPhetres1, Ailin Han1, Halo H Gao1
1Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Humans struggle to detect their own piloerection (goosebumps) and are unaware it occurs across multiple body parts. Self-reported goosebumps often don't match observable physiological responses.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Piloerection, or goosebumps, is a key thermoregulatory and social signaling mechanism in animals.
- In humans, piloerection is often linked to emotional experiences, but its physiological functions are less pronounced.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate human ability to detect their own piloerection events.
- To examine awareness of piloerection occurrence across different anatomical locations.
- To assess the relationship between self-reported goosebumps and observed physiological responses.
Main Methods:
- Three studies involving 617 participants were conducted.
- Methods included observation of piloerection, self-reporting of goosebumps, and measurement of heart-rate variability and interoceptive awareness.
- Data were analyzed to compare self-reports with observed piloerection across various body parts and emotional states.
Main Results:
- Participants generally failed to detect their own piloerection events.
- Self-reported goosebumps frequently did not align with observable piloerection (only 31.8% concordance).
- There was a bias in self-reporting towards the forearm, despite equal piloerection frequency elsewhere, and low correlation between emotional experiences and observed piloerection.
Conclusions:
- Humans exhibit a significant disconnect between the physiological response of piloerection and their capacity for self-monitoring.
- The perceived link between goosebumps and profound emotional experiences in humans may be overestimated.
- Piloerection's diminished role in human thermoregulation and communication might explain these differences compared to non-human animals.
More Related Videos
04:27Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans
Published on: March 15, 2019
05:51Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 15, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Prosopagnosia
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Emotional Expression
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
Labeling Emotion
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...