Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2025

05:49
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
830
Artificial intelligence as a prediction tool for orthognathic surgery assessment
Pedro Henrique José de Oliveira1, Tengfei Li2, Haoyue Li3
1Department of Morphology, Genetics, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
|May 8, 2024
Summary
This study used machine learning (ML) models to predict the need for orthognathic surgery versus orthodontics. The combined 10 ML model accurately identified treatment needs, particularly for Class III patients.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- Accurate diagnosis of dental and skeletal discrepancies is crucial for ideal orthodontic treatment.
- Distinguishing between orthodontics and orthognathic surgery can be challenging, especially for borderline cases.
- Technological advancements and big data are driving the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive capacity of various machine learning (ML) models in determining the necessity of orthognathic surgery versus conventional orthodontics.
- To utilize soft and hard tissue cephalometric data for treatment prediction.
- To compare ML model performance against expert clinical judgment.
Main Methods:
- A dataset of 920 lateral cephalograms from patients treated with orthodontics or combined orthognathic surgery was analyzed.
- Thirty-two cephalometric measurements were extracted from each radiograph.
- Ten ML models were trained, validated, and tested on the data, with performance compared to a panel of four experts.
Main Results:
- The combined prediction from 10 ML models demonstrated high accuracy, F1-score, and AUC values on the test dataset.
- Performance was notable across the entire sample (Accuracy: 0.707, F1: 0.706, AUC: 0.791), Class II patients (Accuracy: 0.759, F1: 0.758, AUC: 0.824), and Class III patients (Accuracy: 0.822, F1: 0.807, AUC: 0.89).
Conclusions:
- The integrated 10 ML model effectively predicted the requirement for orthognathic surgery.
- The model exhibited superior performance in predicting treatment needs for Class III malocclusions.

