Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.
Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue01:27

Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue

Chondrocytes form a temporary cartilaginous model by dividing and secreting a thick gel-like extracellular matrix. Once the chondrocytes undergo programmed cell death, osteoblasts enter the site of the cartilaginous model. The process of replacing the temporary cartilaginous model with bone in an ordered manner is called endochondral ossification. In endochondral ossification, not all of the cartilage is replaced by bone tissue. Some cartilage that performs a protective and supportive function...
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling01:31

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during bone...
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification01:29

Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification

Intramembranous ossification is one of the two processes involved in the development of bones within an embryo. The flat bones of the face, most of the cranial bones, and the clavicles are formed via this process. During intramembranous ossification, the bones develop directly from sheets of undifferentiated mesenchymal connective tissue.
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into...
Bone Disorders01:29

Bone Disorders

Aging and its effect on bone remodeling is the most common cause of bone disorders. In young and healthy people, bone deposition and resorption happen at an equal rate to maintain optimal bone health.
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age01:09

Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age

The upper and lower limb initially develops as a small bulge called a limb bud, which appears on the lateral side of the early embryo. The upper limb bud appears near the end of the fourth week of development, with the lower limb bud appearing shortly after.
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International urogynecological consultation chapter 4.1: definition of outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

International urogynecology journal·2023
Same author

Changing the Name of the Subspecialty (Back) to Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery.

Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2023
Same author

Changing the Name of the Subspecialty (Back) to Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2023
Same author

Standard Restrictions vs Expedited Activity After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA surgery·2023
Same author

The American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry Bears Fruit.

Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2022
Same author

Subgroups of failure after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and associations with quality of life outcomes: a longitudinal cluster analysis.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2021
Same journal

Global Landscape and Translational Trajectories of Pelvic Floor Muscle Rehabilitation for Urinary Incontinence.

International urogynecology journal·2026
Same journal

Acquired Complete Obliteration of the Vaginal Canal-Surgical Techniques for Management.

International urogynecology journal·2026
Same journal

Factors Associated with Urinary Incontinence During Pregnancy: Clinical, Obstetric, and Metabolic Analysis.

International urogynecology journal·2026
Same journal

Comment on "TECAR Therapy in Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Women with Pelvic Pain: A Case-Control Study".

International urogynecology journal·2026
Same journal

Pharmacological Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence with Atypical Leakage Features, Symptom Response to Short-Term Solifenacin Trial.

International urogynecology journal·2026
Same journal

Sacral Neuromodulation Test-Phase Success in Bladder Pain Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

International urogynecology journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
03:49

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System

Published on: September 20, 2018

19.0K

Measuring Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An Evolution.

Matthew D Barber1

  • 1W. Allen Addison Professor and Chair, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, 203 Baker House, Box 3084, Durham, NC, 27720, USA. matthew.barber@duke.edu.

International Urogynecology Journal
|May 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patient symptoms, especially vaginal bulge, are more important than anatomy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) outcomes. Focus on symptomatic cure for better clinical relevance in POP research and treatment.

Keywords:
Composite outcomesMeasurementOutcome measuresPatient-reported outcomesPelvic organ prolapse

More Related Videos

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
07:41

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Published on: April 17, 2019

9.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
03:30

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
03:49

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System

Published on: September 20, 2018

19.0K
Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
07:41

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Published on: April 17, 2019

9.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
03:30

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Urogynecology
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Female Pelvic Medicine

Background:

  • Advances in understanding pelvic organ prolapse (POP) rely on valid measures of anatomy and patient-reported outcomes.
  • The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) has been pivotal in assessing POP.
  • Understanding POP requires evaluating both anatomical and symptomatic aspects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution of POP measurement techniques.
  • To discuss the implications of POP measurement for clinical practice and research.
  • To highlight the importance of patient-reported outcomes in POP management.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of POP measurement evolution.
  • Analysis of studies utilizing the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ).
  • Comparison of anatomic and subjective measures of POP severity and treatment success.

Main Results:

  • Some degree of anatomical prolapse is common, even in asymptomatic women.
  • Vaginal bulge symptoms are the most specific indicator of POP.
  • Correlation between pelvic floor symptoms and anatomical severity is weak to moderate.
  • Treatment success rates vary widely due to differing criteria; anatomic success definitions are often too strict.
  • Significant discordance exists between subjective and anatomical measures of treatment success.

Conclusions:

  • Pelvic organ prolapse is a complex, multidimensional condition impacting patients significantly.
  • Patient symptoms, particularly the absence of vaginal bulge, are more clinically relevant than anatomical cure.
  • Composite outcomes can be misleading; continuous variables are preferred for future research.
  • Future studies should prioritize symptomatic outcomes and continuous variables over dichotomous success/failure metrics.