Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

06:16
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
400
Validation of the European Society of Cardiology pretest probability models for obstructive coronary artery disease
Ivona Vranic1, Ivan Stankovic2, Aleksandra Ignjatovic3
1Clinical Hospital Centre Zemun, Department of Cardiology, Vukova 9, Belgrade 11 000, Serbia.
Summary
The 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) pre-test probability (PTP) model for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) underestimated prevalence in a high-risk Serbian population. Both 2013 and 2019 ESC-PTP models showed moderate accuracy for diagnosing CAD.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Accuracy
- Epidemiology
Background:
- The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) updated its pre-test probability (PTP) model for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in 2019.
- External validation of the updated model in high-incidence CAD populations is lacking.
- This study aimed to validate the 2019 ESC-PTP model in a Serbian population with high CAD incidence and compare it with the 2013 ESC-PTP model.
Purpose of the Study:
- To externally validate the 2019 ESC-PTP model for obstructive CAD in a high-risk Serbian population.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of the 2019 ESC-PTP model against the 2013 ESC-PTP model.
- To assess the accuracy of both models in a population with a high prevalence of CAD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1294 symptomatic patients with suspected CAD (2015-2019).
- Calculation of PTP scores using 2013 ESC-PTP and 2019 ESC-PTP models based on age, gender, and symptoms.
- Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) performed for all patients to confirm obstructive CAD.
Main Results:
- Obstructive CAD was diagnosed in 533 patients (41.2%).
- The 2019 ESC-PTP model classified significantly more patients as low probability (<15%) compared to the 2013 ESC-PTP model (39.8% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001).
- The 2019 ESC-PTP model underestimated CAD prevalence (calibration intercept 1.15, slope 0.96), while the 2013 ESC-PTP model overestimated it (calibration intercept -0.24, slope 0.73). Both models demonstrated moderate discrimination (similar AUC).
Conclusions:
- Both the 2013 and 2019 ESC-PTP models exhibited moderate accuracy for diagnosing CAD in the high-risk Serbian population.
- The 2019 ESC-PTP model tended to underestimate CAD prevalence, whereas the 2013 ESC-PTP model overestimated it.
- Further research is needed to develop and validate PTP models specifically for high-risk countries.

