Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound

Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound

To obtain accurate blood pressure measurements in clinical settings, especially when traditional methods are insufficient, healthcare professionals utilize the Doppler ultrasound technique. This method uses high-frequency sound waves to detect blood flow within the arteries, which is crucial for patients with conditions that complicate circulatory system assessment.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Quantification of Histotripsy Dosage Using Machine Learning-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging Analysis: Correlation with Histological Outcomes.

Academic radiology·2026

Same author

Accuracy and bias of high-frequency ultrasonography in measuring white spot lesion depth: an in-vitro comparison with micro-CT.

Clinical oral investigations·2026

Same author

Thermoacoustic Ultrasound Assessment of Liver Steatosis-A Novel Approach for MASLD Diagnosis.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Real-time drug release monitoring from acoustically responsive scaffolds.

Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2026

Same author

Automated Ultrasound-Based Analysis of Urethral Kinematics in Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Pilot Study.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2026

Same author

Statistical modeling of blood and tissue signatures using ultrasonic color flow imaging.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2026

Same journal

Cardiac Natural Mechanical Wave Detection and Speed Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based 2-D Ultrasound Imaging: A Feasibility Study.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Simulating the Dedifferentiation Process of Thyroid Cancer: Insights from Mouse Models and Ultrasound Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

A Nomogram Based on Ultrasound Features for Predicting Major Intra-Operative Hemorrhage in Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS).

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

MedLP-HAFB-CLIP: Hierarchical Adaptive Large Model With Learnable Medical Prompts for Level II Ultrasound Standard Plane Identification.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

Same journal

Data Assimilating B-splines for Model-based Regularization in Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging

Published on: March 6, 2013

Color Flow Ultrasound Spatial Sampling Beam Density for Partial Volume-Corrected Three-Dimensional Volume Flow

Stephen Z Pinter¹, Jonathan M Rubin¹, Anne L Hall²

¹Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

|May 10, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate three-dimensional volume flow (3DVF) measurements require sufficient spatial sampling density. Achieving 6x6 beams minimizes bias, crucial for clinical applications of 3DVF.

Keywords:

Beam density C-plane Color flow ultrasound Color power ultrasound Flow phantom Gaussian surface integration principle Partial volume Point spread function Three-dimensional imaging Volume flow

More Related Videos

Blood Flow Imaging with Ultrafast Doppler

Blood Flow Imaging with Ultrafast Doppler

Published on: October 14, 2020

Deep Vascular Imaging in the Eye with Flow-Enhanced Ultrasound

Deep Vascular Imaging in the Eye with Flow-Enhanced Ultrasound

Published on: October 4, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 12, 2026

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging

Published on: March 6, 2013

Blood Flow Imaging with Ultrafast Doppler

Blood Flow Imaging with Ultrafast Doppler

Published on: October 14, 2020

Deep Vascular Imaging in the Eye with Flow-Enhanced Ultrasound

Deep Vascular Imaging in the Eye with Flow-Enhanced Ultrasound

Published on: October 4, 2021

Area of Science:

Ultrasound imaging
Fluid dynamics
Medical physics

Background:

Three-dimensional volume flow (3DVF) measurements are vital for assessing blood flow.
Accuracy of 3DVF can be affected by spatial sampling density and partial volume effects.
Parametric analysis is needed to optimize 3DVF measurement accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantify the accuracy of partial volume-corrected 3DVF measurements.
To determine the relationship between 3DVF accuracy and spatial sampling beam density.
To provide guidance for the clinical application of 3DVF.

Main Methods:

Experimental investigation using a curvilinear ultrasound array in flow phantoms.
Acquisition of 3D color flow images in phantoms with varying lumen diameters and flow rates.
Computation of partial volume-corrected 3DVF and determination of point spread function (PSF) at different depths.

Main Results:

Accurate 3DVF measurements (bias < ±20%) were achieved with at least 6 elevational and 8 lateral beams.
Measurement bias increased with decreased spatial sampling density.
Lateral-to-elevational beam width asymmetry was observed (average 1:2).

Conclusions:

Clinical applications of 3DVF should target areas with a spatial sampling density of at least 6x6 beams (lateral x elevational).
Matrix-based ultrasound arrays with symmetric PSFs may improve accuracy in smaller vessels.
Optimizing beam density is essential for minimizing 3DVF measurement bias.