Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.2K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.2K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

3.6K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.6K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.5K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.5K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

1.9K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
1.9K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

124
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
124

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame Topic

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Robust Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis: Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of dependent effect sizes.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Comparing variable selection and model averaging methods for logistic regression.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

LLM-based prior elicitation for Bayesian graphical modeling.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.6K

Testing Conditional Independence in Psychometric Networks: An Analysis of Three Bayesian Methods.

Nikola Sekulovski1, Sara Keetelaar1, Karoline Huth1,2,3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|May 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study reviews Bayesian methods for network psychometrics, crucial for identifying independent psychological variables. It clarifies how these methods distinguish between no evidence and evidence of no connection, aiding causal inference.

Keywords:
Bayes factorBayesian model averagingConditional independenceMarkov random fields

More Related Videos

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.7K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.6K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.7K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistics
  • Network Science

Background:

  • Network psychometrics analyzes psychological variable networks using graphical models.
  • Identifying conditional independence is key to understanding causal structures in psychological processes.
  • Accurate hypothesis testing for conditional independence is crucial for network psychometrics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conceptually review three Bayesian approaches for assessing conditional independence in network psychometrics.
  • To highlight the strengths and limitations of these methods through a simulation study.
  • To provide guidance on selecting the optimal method and identify research gaps.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual review of existing Bayesian methods for conditional independence testing.
  • Simulation study to evaluate method performance.
  • Empirical illustration using Dark Triad Personality data.

Main Results:

  • The study provides a conceptual understanding of Bayesian conditional independence methods.
  • Simulation results highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach.
  • Empirical data analysis demonstrates practical application.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian approaches offer nuanced insights into network connections, distinguishing absence of evidence from evidence of absence.
  • Method selection depends on specific research goals and data characteristics.
  • Further research is needed to refine and expand Bayesian methods in network psychometrics.