Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
Published on: March 29, 2022
Accuracy of 20 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Medium-Long Eyes
Wiktor Stopyra1,2, Oleksiy Voytsekhivskyy3, Andrzej Grzybowski4,5
1MW-Med Eye Centre, 31-416, Krakow, Poland. wiktorstopyra@gmail.com.
Introduction:
The aim of this work is to compare 20 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in medium-long eyes (24.50-25.99 mm) in terms of root mean square absolute error (RMSAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and percentage of eyes with prediction error (PE) within ± 0.50 D.
Methods:
The data of patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification between January 2017 and September 2023 were reviewed. Pre-surgery IOL power was calculated using Holladay1, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, and Haigis. Three months after phacoemulsification, refraction was measured. Post-surgery IOL power calculations were performed utilizing the following formulas: Barrett Universal II, Kane, K6, Olsen (OLCR), Olsen (standalone), PEARL-DGS, Ladas Super Formula AI (LSF AI), T2, EVO, VRF, Hoffer QST, Castrop, VRF-G, Karmona, and Naeser 2. RMSAE, MedAE, and percentage of eyes with PE within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, ± 0.75 D and ± 1.00 were calculated.
Results:
One hundred twenty-four eyes with axial length ranges between 24.52 and 25.97 mm were studied. The SRK/T formula yielded the lowest RMSAE (0.206) just before Holladay 1 (0.260) and T2 (0.261). In terms of MedAE, the best outcome was obtained by SRK/T (0.12) followed by Barrett Universal II (0.15) and LSF AI (0.15). The highest percentage of eyes with prediction error within ± 0.50 D was achieved by SRK/T, T2, and Holladay 1 (97.58, 93.55, and 93.55%, respectively).
Conclusions:
Third-generation formulas (SRK/T, Holladay 1) provided highly accurate outcomes in medium-long eyes and still can be wildly used to calculate IOL power.
