Morphologic patterns observed in prostate biopsy cases with discrepant grade group and molecular risk classification
- Nancy Y Greenland 1,2, Matthew R Cooperberg 2,3, Peter R Carroll 2,3, Janet E Cowan 2,3, Jeffry P Simko 1,2, Bradley A Stohr 1,2, Emily Chan 1,2,4
- Nancy Y Greenland 1,2, Matthew R Cooperberg 2,3, Peter R Carroll 2,3
- 1Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
- 2UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
- 3Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
- 4Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
- 0Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Discrepancies between Gleason Grade Group (GG) and Decipher prostate cancer risk scores were analyzed. Difficult-to-grade patterns were common in low-GG/high-Decipher cases, while aggressive features appeared in high-GG/low-Decipher cases.
Area Of Science
- Urology
- Oncology
- Pathology
Background
- Molecular-based risk classifiers like the Decipher prostate biopsy test are increasingly used to guide treatment decisions.
- The Decipher test is a 22-gene RNA assay predicting high-grade disease, metastasis, and mortality risk, categorized as low, intermediate, or high.
- This study investigates histologic features in prostate biopsies where the Grade Group (GG) and Decipher risk category were discordant.
Purpose Of The Study
- To examine the histologic characteristics of prostate biopsies with discordant Grade Group (GG) and Decipher molecular risk categories.
- To identify potential reasons for discrepancies between traditional histologic grading and molecular risk assessment.
Main Methods
- A retrospective review of 178 men with prostate biopsies and Decipher testing (2016-2020) was conducted.
- Discrepancies were defined as GG1-2 with high Decipher risk or GG≥3 with low Decipher risk.
- Biopsy slides were re-reviewed for GG and specific histologic features, including Gleason patterns, high-risk features (e.g., IDC), and difficult-to-grade patterns.
Main Results
- Of 178 men, 41 (23%) had discordant GG and Decipher risk; 33 slides were reviewed.
- Among these, 23 had GG1-2 with high Decipher risk, often showing difficult-to-grade patterns (e.g., atrophic carcinoma, collagenous fibroplasia).
- Ten had GG≥3 with low Decipher risk, with half exhibiting aggressive histologic patterns like large cribriform or intraductal carcinoma (IDC).
Conclusions
- Difficult-to-grade patterns are frequently observed in GG1-2 cases with high Decipher risk, suggesting potential underestimation of risk by histology alone.
- Aggressive histologic patterns were present in half of GG≥3 cases with low Decipher risk, indicating that molecular classifiers may not encompass all high-risk histologic features.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

