Risk assessment models for PICC-related venous thrombosis in adult patients with cancer: A network meta-analysis

  • 0State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Michigan risk score (MRS) shows promise as the most accurate tool for predicting peripherally inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis (PICC-RVT) in cancer patients. Further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness across diverse clinical settings.

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Vascular Access
  • Medical Informatics

Background

  • Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are crucial for cancer patient care but carry a risk of venous thrombosis (PICC-RVT).
  • Accurate risk assessment models (RAMs) are needed to identify high-risk patients and guide preventative strategies.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To systematically compare the predictive performance of various RAMs for PICC-RVT in adult cancer patients.
  • To identify the most accurate RAM for this specific patient population.

Main Methods

  • A systematic literature search was performed across ten databases up to October 20, 2023.
  • Included studies compared the accuracy of at least two RAMs for predicting PICC-RVT.
  • A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was employed to evaluate RAM performance.

Main Results

  • Seven studies involving 10 RAMs were included after screening 1931 records.
  • The Caprini, Padua prediction score, Autar, Michigan risk score (MRS), and Seeley score were among the most frequently evaluated RAMs.
  • The MRS demonstrated significantly greater predictive accuracy compared to the Caprini and Autar RAMs, and higher specificity than six other models.

Conclusions

  • The MRS appears to be the most accurate RAM for identifying cancer patients at high risk of PICC-RVT.
  • Additional high-quality studies are recommended to validate the accuracy of the MRS in varied clinical contexts.

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis 01:21

345

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches 01:23

125

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition 01:27

144

Parenteral Nutrition (PN) delivers essential nutrients directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive system. It is commonly used for individuals with severe digestive disorders or conditions that prevent normal nutrient absorption.
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...