Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring oncogenic driver alterations other than
Tian Tian1, Yanying Li1, Juan Li2
1Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment and Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Background:
The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic driver alterations other than epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) aroused a heated discussion. We thus aimed to evaluate ICI treatment in these patients in real-world routine clinical practice.
Methods:
A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted for NSCLC patients with at least one gene alteration (KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, RET, ALK, ROS1) receiving ICI monotherapy or combination treatment. The data regarding clinicopathologic characteristics, clinical efficacy, and safety were investigated.
Results:
A total of 216 patients were included, the median age was 60 years, 72.7% of patients were male, and 46.8% had a smoking history. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n=95), HER2 (n=42), BRAF (n=22), MET (n=21), RET (n=14), ALK (n=14), and ROS1 (n=8); 56.5% of patients received immunotherapy in the first-line, and the rest 43.5% were treated as a second-line and above. For the entire cohort who received immunotherapy-based regimens in the first-line, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months. For the entire cohort who received immunotherapy-based regimens in the second-line and above, the median PFS was 4.7 months and median OS was 17.1 months. KRAS mutated NSCLC treated with immunotherapy-based regimens in the first-line setting had a median PFS and OS were 7.8 and 26.1 months, respectively. Moreover, the median PFS and OS of immunotherapy-based regimens for KRAS-mutant NSCLC that progressed after chemotherapy were 5.9 and 17.1 months. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level was not consistently associated with response to immunotherapy across different gene alteration subsets. In the KRAS group, PD-L1 positivity [tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1%] was associated with better PFS and OS according to the multivariate Cox analysis. No statistically significant association was found for smoking status, age, or gender with clinical efficacy in any gene group analyses.
Conclusions:
KRAS-mutant NSCLC could obtain clinical benefits from ICIs either for treatment-naive patients or those who have experienced progression after chemotherapy, and PD-L1 positive expression (TPS >1%) may be a potential positive predictor. For NSCLC with ALK, RET and ROS1 rearrangement, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, or BRAF V600E mutation, effectiveness of single or combined ICI therapy remains limited, therefore, targeted therapies should be considered prior to immunotherapy regimens. Future studies should address the investigation of better predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response in oncogene-driven NSCLC.
Insights
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show benefit in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS mutations, especially when PD-L1 is positive. Other oncogenic driver alterations may have limited response to ICIs.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Genomics
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a key treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- The efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC with specific oncogenic driver alterations (excluding EGFR) is under investigation.
- Real-world data is crucial for understanding ICI treatment in diverse NSCLC patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oncogenic driver alterations.
- To compare ICI treatment outcomes across different genetic alterations, including KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, ALK, and ROS1.
- To identify potential predictive biomarkers for ICI response in oncogene-driven NSCLC.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, retrospective study analyzed 216 NSCLC patients with genetic alterations (KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, RET, ALK, ROS1).
- Patients received ICI monotherapy or combination treatment, with data collected on clinicopathologic characteristics, efficacy, and safety.
- Outcomes were assessed based on first-line versus second-line or later treatment, specific gene alterations, and PD-L1 expression.
Main Results:
- First-line immunotherapy regimens yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.5 months and overall survival (OS) of 24.8 months.
- KRAS-mutant NSCLC showed promising outcomes with first-line ICIs (median PFS 7.8 months, OS 26.1 months) and in patients progressing after chemotherapy (median PFS 5.9 months, OS 17.1 months).
- PD-L1 positivity (TPS ≥1%) was associated with better PFS and OS in the KRAS group; however, ICI effectiveness was limited for NSCLC with ALK, RET, ROS1, MET, or BRAF mutations.
Conclusions:
- KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients can benefit from ICIs, with PD-L1 positivity potentially predicting a positive response.
- For NSCLC with ALK, RET, ROS1, MET, or BRAF mutations, targeted therapies may be more effective than ICIs.
- Further research is needed to identify reliable predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response in oncogene-driven NSCLC.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle