Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Monotherapy versus combination for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a multicenter cohort study
Thamer A Almangour1, Hussain A Alali2, Zakiyah Alkherb2
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Background:
The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of monotherapy versus combination therapy for the treatment of infections caused by S. maltophilia.
Methods:
This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study included patients treated with either monotherapy or combination therapy for infections caused by S. maltophilia. Primary outcomes included overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and clinical cure. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used as a control for confounding variables.
Results:
A total of 407 patients were included, 330 patients received monotherapy and 77 patients received combination therapy. A total of 21% presented with concomitant bacteremia. After adjusting the differences between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences between patients who received monotherapy versus combination therapy in clinical cure (55% vs 65%; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.40-1.31) and overall in-hospital mortality (52% vs 49%; OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.45-1.57). However, patients who received monotherapy had a lower rate of 30-day mortality (28% vs 32%; OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.90) and acute kidney injury (9% vs 18%; OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.78).
Conclusion:
Clinical outcomes did not significantly differ in patients who received combination therapy versus monotherapy. More data are needed to validate these findings.
Insights
This study found no significant difference in clinical outcomes between monotherapy and combination therapy for *S. maltophilia* infections. However, monotherapy was associated with lower 30-day mortality and acute kidney injury rates.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Medical Microbiology
Background:
- *Stenotrophomonas maltophilia* is an opportunistic pathogen causing various infections.
- Treatment strategies include monotherapy and combination therapy.
- Comparative effectiveness of these strategies requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and effectiveness of monotherapy versus combination therapy for *S. maltophilia* infections.
- To evaluate clinical cure, mortality rates, and safety outcomes.
- To identify optimal treatment approaches for *S. maltophilia*.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, multicenter, cohort study design.
- Inclusion of 407 patients treated with monotherapy or combination therapy.
- Multivariable logistic regression analysis to control for confounding variables.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in clinical cure or overall in-hospital mortality between monotherapy and combination therapy groups.
- Monotherapy group showed a lower rate of 30-day mortality (28% vs 32%).
- Monotherapy group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of acute kidney injury (9% vs 18%).
Conclusions:
- Clinical outcomes were comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy for *S. maltophilia* infections.
- Monotherapy may be associated with improved safety outcomes, specifically reduced 30-day mortality and acute kidney injury.
- Further research is warranted to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:

