Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with the use of thinner polyethylene liners compared to
Ryan Cheng1, Billy Kim1, Walter L Taylor1
1Department of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of intraoperative technology use on the rate of using polyethylene liners 15 mm or greater during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods:
There were 103,295 implants from 16,386 primary unilateral TKAs performed on 14,253 patients at a single institution between 1 January 2018, and 30 June 2022, included in the current study. Robotic assistance and navigation guidance were used in 1274 (8%) and 8345 (51%) procedures, respectively. The remaining 6767 TKAs (41%) were performed manually. Polyethylene liners were manually identified and further subcategorised by implant thickness. Patients who underwent robotic-assisted TKA were younger (p < 0.001) and more likely to be male (p < 0.001) compared to patients who underwent navigation-guided or manual TKAs.
Results:
Average polyethylene liner thickness was similar between groups (10.5 ± 1.5 mm for robotic-assisted TKAs, 10.9 ± 1.8 mm for navigation-guided TKAs and 10.8 ± 1.8 mm for manual TKAs). The proportions of polyethylene liners 15 mm or greater used were 4.9%, 3.8% and 1.9% for navigation-guided, manual and robotic-assisted procedures, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that navigation-guided (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6, 95% confidence Interval [CI]: [1.75-4.07], p < 0.001) and manual (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: [1.34-3.20], p = 0.001) procedures were associated with an increased use of polyethylene liners 15 mm or greater.
Conclusion:
Robotic-assisted TKA was associated with a lower proportion of polyethylene liners 15 mm or greater used compared to navigation-guided and manual TKA. These findings suggest that robotic assistance can reduce human error via a more precise cutting system, limit over-resection of the tibia and flexion-extension gap mismatch and ultimately allow for more appropriately sized implants.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
06:17Augmented Reality Navigation-Guided Core Decompression for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head
Published on: April 12, 2022