Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025
Optimized Analysis of In Vivo and In Vitro Hepatic Steatosis
Published on: March 11, 2017
Head-to-head comparison of three different US-based quantitative parameters for hepatic steatosis assessment: a
Yan Zhou1,2, Mengjin Nie1,2,3, Hongyu Zhou1,2
1Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Hedong District, No. 83 Jintang Road, Tianjin, 300170, China.
Purpose:
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of attenuation coefficient (AC), hepato-renal index (HRI) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) in quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis by employing histopathology as reference standard.
Methods:
Participants with suspected metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) who underwent US-based parameter examinations and liver biopsy were prospectively recruited. The distributions of US parameters across different grades of steatosis were calculated, and diagnostic performance was determined based on the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results:
A total of 73 participants were included, with hepatic steatosis grades S0, S1, S2, and S3 distributed as follows: 13, 20, 27, and 13 respectively. The correlation coefficients for CAP, AC, and HRI ranged from 0.67 to 0.74. AC and HRI showed a strong correlation with steatosis grade. The AUC for CAP and AC in diagnosing steatosis ≥ S1 were significantly higher at 0.99 and 0.98 compared to HRI's value. For diagnosing steatosis ≥ S2, the AUC of CAP (AUC: 0.85) was lower than that of AC (AUC: 0.94), and HRI (AUC: 0.94). Similarly for diagnosing steatosis S3, the AUC of CAP (AUC: 0.68) was lower than that of AC (AUC: 0.88), and HRI (AUC: 0.88).
Conclusion:
The AC and HRI values increased with the progression of hepatic steatosis grade, while CAP increased from S0 to S2 but not from S2 to S3. For mild steatosis diagnosis, CAP and AC showed superior diagnostic performance compared to HRI, while AC and HRI were more advantageous in differentiating moderate and severe steatosis.
